Well, not quite that cut and cry. If TA is an after-the-fact, then how can you explain why the price reversed exactly at the trendline as shown below?If news does not move the markets, then what does? A head and shoulder pattern that forms after the fact of the move?
Well, not quite that cut and cry. If TA is an after-the-fact, then how can you explain why the price reversed exactly at the trendline as shown below?
View attachment 217731
Cognitive bias type of thing?Because you are drawing what fits your narrative, after-the-fact.
Cognitive bias type of thing?
Ooops! So much for that idea. So in looking at your charts, what are your TA indicators telling you to do for tomorrow? Long, short, or stay out? Well, we know the market is going to move, but we do not know which way. Only the news will direct the movement, which will then lead to the market painting it's picture of it in these patterns, after the fact.
The only leading indicator of the markets is being a bedfellow of Powell and Trump, literally. And the thought of that is just disgusting, lol!
So if you are a large speculator with massive size to move do you just flip flop your position every time a new tweet comes out or when new headlines hit the wires? Is this logical?
I would not know, since I am not a large speculator. But as to the flip-flop idea? You betcha, if you are a specerlator!
...
Personally I believe that Price behavior tends to precede news because informed speculators position for things in advance. Just a theory.. obviously I have no proof for any of this.