If news does not move the markets, then what does? A head and shoulder pattern that forms after the fact of the move?
Players move the markets. They may respond to the news and they may not.
How many really bad news items have there been the last 10 years which the stock markets have just shrugged off like it's nothing? A lot. Equally, there can be very bullish news that does not seem to matter either.
News is just a convencience to explain price movements when one have no other means to explain them. You see it in the media all the time. On Friday, I bet the papers were writing: "The markets fell on fears of the corona virus spreading..."
If the markets rose on Friday, they would be writing: "The markets rose in spite of reports of the corona virus spreading, suggesting that investors believe that..."
Bottom line is that these financial commentators knows jack sh*t about
why price does what it does. The commentary may be interesting to know what's going on in the world, but it sure as hell ain't useful for trading.
As a trader, you should not be worrying about WHY, but about HOW. How to trade price movement.
FWIW, I was bearish for last week already on Sunday and it had nothing to do with Corona.
