Quote from Ricter:
My newest opinions re ignore:
1) Using it so you don't see viewpoints you don't like is thin-skinned.
2) Using it but then "taking shots" at the guys you have on ignore is cowardly.
3) Using it and making a big, public pronouncement of it is childish.
4) Using it so you don't see ad hominem attacks against you is reasonable.
Like when I challenged your nonsensical argument that if Buffett wanted the rich to pay more taxes then he should go ahead and just pay more himself? And my taking you to task on that BS argument is what precipitated you to place me on ignore. That was it. Forget #4. You're #1.Quote from Tsing Tao:
I would closest resemble #4 in your example. Though I would ad that the attacks wouldn't bother me if they were intermingled with content. Ie, part of the debate. But if all they are is attacks, then seriously, what is the point in engaging that person?
Quote from Brass:
Like when I challenged your nonsensical argument that if Buffett wanted the rich to pay more taxes then he should go ahead and just pay more himself? And my taking you to task on that BS argument is what precipitated you to place me on ignore. That was it. Forget #4. You're #1.
Quote from RCG Trader:
quoted so tsing can see this
Quote from Tsing Tao:
Yes, and every step of the way you were insulting and snide. Every single step, and when challenged on it, you fell back on the "I'm kidding!" excuse. You can say I'm #1 if you want, go for it. Its your right.
You're not worth the time.
RCG, if you're going to get in a habit of doing this, then I gotta put you on ignore as well. I enjoy (most of) our little conversations, so please don't.