The richest woman of the gilded age

Recall what "miser" means. She probably was not prone to just giving away money to others, including her own family.

Yes but my point is that son or nephew of hers shouldn't have been relying on her in the first place. Why couldn't they pay for the surgery themselves and instead to have her pay for everything?? I mean when we need to pay for something, we pay for it ourselves; we don't go to our mother or aunt to ask them to pay for it.
 
My only reply to you in this thread

1) I don't need money or wealth when I pass on.
2) I very much believe that those whom I appoint to receive my leftover wealth are better at managing and using for good than my kids whose career is not focused on such pursuit.
3) I denied nobody. I invested in everything my kids needed until they finished college. Everything else is on them. I don't believe in legacies. Legacies are for scared old men who realize at old age that they can't take their wealth with them, that they will be stripped naked and go back to the same soil they came from. In their sheer panic of realization they now affix little names and titles on the front porches of libraries. How pathetic for men who built fortunes.
4) I don't believe that every government does well with managing funds. Hence the 100% inheritance tax. Nobody in their right mind would pass any wealth on but invest it in others in their life time. Not to hold on to financial wealth but to spread it through charitable giving.

Assume this is true, what are you going to do with your money, assume there is some left over after you pass on? Burn them in a fireplace or shred them in a shredder? If your answer is donating to charities, you are still creating generational wealth, the only difference is the difference in the recipients. Instead of passing it on to people who are related to you, you opt to pass it on to people who are not.

Again, assuming this is true, it's very noble of your children to have respected your wish but if they have inherited your wealth, I am 100% certain they would still be well-adjusted and positive individuals. The only difference is you have denied them, actually half of your future self the opportunity to carry on your legacy and continue to develop and grow it to something even more phenomenal. And 100% tax on inheritance? LOL You assume the government will manage the inheritance better than your children? If you believe so much in the state, why don't you pay 100% tax now on all of your income? Why don't you hand every single penny of your income now to the government to manage? Why wait until you are six feet under to hand everything to the government? LOL

As I have known always, you are just a troll, putting in thoughtless crap full of contradiction just to garner attention.
 
Well with all due respect, you know nothing about me and I equally know nothing about you and, judging from your posts, I don't have the slightest interest to change that. If you don't get the point on inheritance and deem it quint essential then I am afraid you have understood nothing about the true meaning of life. That's my last response to you in this thread as you are only here to stink.

Perhaps, but I didn't just manufacture a fantasy that my kids won't inherit to prove a point to a bunch of anon-degens.
 
Well with all due respect, you know nothing about me and I equally know nothing about you and, judging from your posts, do I have the slightest interest to change that. If you don't get the point on inheritance and deem it quint essential then I am afraid you have understood nothing about the true meaning of life. That's my last response to you in this thread as you are only here to stink.


You’re not dumb so I suspect you get my point that we all know who you are and a few know your background… which doesn’t involve children.

Perhaps it’s time for some self-reflection. Ask yourself how pathetic it was to invent children to further a meaningless argument on a meaningless thread.

Done here, thanks.
 
And another thread derailed by the same idiot who screamed around he would leave and never come back, lol. Cried like a little baby when he did not get from Baron what he wanted. Back he is, same shitty attitude to life and everyone around him.
 
And another thread derailed by the same idiot who screamed around he would leave and never come back, lol. Cried like a little baby when he did not get from Baron what he wanted. Back he is, same shitty attitude to life and everyone around him.


Baron stated he would give me self-mod provided I didn’t abuse it. My point was made that I am too valuable. ;)

love you, tho.
 
Yes but my point is that son or nephew of hers shouldn't have been relying on her in the first place. Why couldn't they pay for the surgery themselves and instead to have her pay for everything?? I mean when we need to pay for something, we pay for it ourselves; we don't go to our mother or aunt to ask them to pay for it.

I guess things were different at the turn of the last century? (19 naughts). Not everyone had good salaries back then?
 
Back
Top