The regularity of the price model in combination of time - volatility

Everyone to their own, I bought a Gann book in my early trading days, cost $100, I recall the price.
I thought after attempting to study, it was a con job, I got fleeced.
Never once has a guy on ET convinced anyone re Gann system, always gibberish as much as I like to be proven wrong.
My understanding Gann was a con artist. EW is similar imo, just bs, gazzillions of lines intersecting a million times. Absolute bunkim.
Gann book is too complicated to understand, especially if a person is not able to understand what exactly he wants to say, but even Gann made a mistake, or did not take into account, and did not spend time studying this nuance.
 
In order for the images to fit, these designs must be completed.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_1.jpg
    Screenshot_1.jpg
    321.5 KB · Views: 68
  • Screenshot_2.jpg
    Screenshot_2.jpg
    254.7 KB · Views: 69
And this scheme has been working for more than 50 years on any trading instrument for minutes and hours and at any other time interval.
 
and for me for three years now it has not been the slightest problem to calculate any trading instrument at any time interval
 
You were convinced of this even on the 15 minute chart

and the work of the secondary price model allows you to adjust the volatility in force majeure. I just didn’t show you her work.

In other words, you simply cannot decrypt the simplest algorithm

I thought I would really get to elitetrader, but I got to where the outright suckers
 
Last edited:
current constructions allowed me to coordinate the further development of this currency pair
You see how simple it is, a small nuance on Monday made it easy to predict the further development of the currency pair, these are nuances that neither Gаnn, nor Gartley, nor Elliott can explain, nor their subsequent followers
 
I tested my system for 3 years, more than 300 forecasts were made of which 98% worked out perfectly

Such a result, even Gunn could not show
May I ask you a question:

How much money did you make using your system to trade?

To an amateur like me it seemed very complicated and hard to understand, but if it is a profitable system I am willing to learn.

Best to you.
 
He has from the start shut his mind.

The problem is that some people thought technical analysis means drawing all those complex colorful triangles and arcs and circles and those things.
To them, TA means complexity and not simplicity.
Perhaps some of you throwing rocks at him also has from the start shut your mind about his method?

I am just an amateur trader so have no right to pontificate, but I am interested in knowing if there are any validities in the claims.
 
Perhaps some of you throwing rocks at him also has from the start shut your mind about his method?

I am just an amateur trader so have no right to pontificate, but I am interested in knowing if there are any validities in the claims.

You are right mister.
I have already shut my mind to those methods and I am glad I did

It is up to individual whether they want to explore those methods
 
Back
Top