The regularity of the price model in combination of time - volatility

[tommcginnis]

For example, unlike the wave theory of the market, which implies the development of 3 to 11 waves, my models always have a complete cycle of 9 moves, and this stability can be traced on any instrument for more than 50 years
Given the theory of the pattern - they reflect the work of 2 patterns at the same time, etc.

CLUE: It can also "work" for a y = α + ßX + [random] where even the drift of ß has an additional, variable, *random* component.

"Derp!"


Consider the "why" on that one.
"...which implies the development of 3 to 11 waves, my models always have a complete cycle of 9 moves,..."
Yeahhhhhh. I'm sure it does.

 

[Resto]

CLUE: It can also "work" for a y = α + ßX + [random] were even the drift of ß has an addition, variable, *random* component.

"Derp!"


Consider the "why" on that one.
"...which implies the development of 3 to 11 waves, my models always have a complete cycle of 9 moves,..."
Yeahhhhhh. I'm sure it does.

any variables are excluded on any chart of any instrument, you just need to carefully consider those nuances that eminent meters of technical analysis have not noticed

 

[BlueWaterSailor]

"Derp!"

"But you simply can't deny the correlation!"

O-kay, then.

 

[Resto]

.This kind of correlation is more suitable for me

BRENT - USDX

 

[Resto]

for example, my forecast from 06/03/2015 Wheat

and its execution in 2018 perfectly executed

 

[tommcginnis]

any variables are excluded on any chart of any instrument, you just need to carefully consider those nuances that eminent meters of technical analysis have not noticed

"...it's right 'ere in muh chicken guts, for *any* foole to see!"

 

[Resto]

"...it's right 'ere in muh chicken guts, for *any* foole to see!"

I tested my system for 3 years, more than 300 forecasts were made of which 98% worked out perfectly

Such a result, even Gunn could not show

 

[tommcginnis]

I tested my system for 3 years, more than 300 forecasts were made of which 98% worked out perfectly

And yet you deign to converse with us, here on lowly E.T. -- while you could be pouring a gabillion rubles more into your net liq.??? We are not worthy, Mighty Resto!

(Okay. I'll stop. No more from me.)

 

[Resto]

(Okay. I'll stop. No more from me.)

thank you very much because not interested in you

 

[Resto]

for example, even the forecast for the DAX index from 05.09,2016 and its current situation is excellent