The Presidential Debates

[piezoe]

You are challenging my statements or innuendo in regard to Joe and misconduct and weirdo stuff in regard to women? Is that what you doing? I am supposed to lay that out for you. Is that what you are saying?

Let's just say, no one else here needs that, regardless of whether they agree or disagree with me on other issues. Have your Visiting Angel google it up for you. Of course, we know your routine. First you know nothing on a topic, then eventually you google wikipedia or something and then immediately become an instant expert.

Whatever. You will not be joining Mensa anytime soon.

Yet, I am the only one of the two of us who has ever provided any direct quotes or verifiable facts. What a strange character you are to persist the way you do with nothing of substance to fall back on.

 

[Ricter]

Yet, I am the only one of the two of us who has ever provided any direct quotes or verifiable facts. What a strange character you are to persist the way you do with nothing of substance to fall back on.

He's a denizen of Troll Nation. TreeFrogTradingTroll.

 

[piezoe]

The Democrats could have won with Tulsi, but they were determined to take her out early because she wouldn't walk the line with everything they wanted. She wasn't a progressive.

I'd have voted for Tulsi in a New York Minute. I'd have gone out and fund raised and done my best to convert conservatives I know to her.

By the way, Joe would not be my first choice either. We are both atypical. The Parties use political consultants and consensus. We both know that. They are looking for the flag bearer that will bring the most votes to their side given the opposition, while also satisfying the Party stalwarts. Given the alternative what choice do i have?. What choice do any of us have? And although I would prefer someone else, Joe would be an OK President.

We get so wrapped up in this issue or that, but the Presidents don't decide, rather they take sides.* We should elect our Presidents according to character and honesty because the Congress and the Courts do the deciding on major issues. For example, we both know, especially in Trumps case -- he is not a Lawyer-- Court nominees tend to be fed to the President by his Party. The Senate, not the President, controls who is elevated to the Court, because the Constitution gives the Senate veto power over Court appointees. That's because of the word "consent", as in "...with the advice and Consent...."

_________________
* It seems, that with the Trump Presidency, the nation is breaking entirely new ground. The present President seems to be driven by only one thing. And that is what is best for him personally. And I find myself unable to disagree with him on this matter. Clearly the best thing for him is to do whatever has the best chance of keeping him out of jail.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

Yet, I am the only one of the two of us who has ever provided any direct quotes or verifiable facts. What a strange character you are to persist the way you do with nothing of substance to fall back on.

I see.

So you continue to say that you have knowledge of Joe's improprieties with women unless I quote them to you.

See if they will let you used the computer or the tv a little more in the day room at "the home."

 

[piezoe]

So you continue to say that you have knowledge of Joe's improprieties with women unless I quote them to you.

Classic trolling! It makes no grammatical sense; yet will get some heads to nod.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

Classic trolling! It makes no grammatical sense; yet will get some heads to nod.

Talk to your Visiting Angel.

Maybe she will read you a book.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Talk to your Visiting Angel.

Maybe she will read you a book.

Ok, now that was funny!

 

[UsualName]

It would make a difference in my opinion on his senility if he crushed Trump in every debate. It would take something more than that to change my opinion that he is a tool of the very far left in his party, and that's a problem.

Moody’s just released an analysis of both Trump’s and Biden’s economic policies, their conclusion is that Biden and a full democrat sweep is the best case scenario in virtually every economic metric.

https://www.moodysanalytics.com/-/m...macroeconomic-consequences-trump-vs-biden.pdf

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

Moody’s just released an analysis of both Trump’s and Biden’s economic policies, their conclusion is that Biden and a full democrat sweep is the best case scenario in virtually every economic metric.

https://www.moodysanalytics.com/-/m...macroeconomic-consequences-trump-vs-biden.pdf

You mean the economic policies that Biden's handlers put out.

Trump is likely to have been front and center and a leader in developing the Trump policies.

Joe most likely does not know what the dem policies are unless they gave him a cheat sheet.

 

[gwb-trading]

Moody’s just released an analysis of both Trump’s and Biden’s economic policies, their conclusion is that Biden and a full democrat sweep is the best case scenario in virtually every economic metric.

https://www.moodysanalytics.com/-/m...macroeconomic-consequences-trump-vs-biden.pdf

91.87% of their money contributed to Democrats in 2020. Need I say more.

https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/totals?id=D000043203