The Presidential Debates

So only progressives can run in the Democratic party? If so, then there's your problem and why you can't easily stomp Trump in an election.

Funny, they use the word Progressive to describe themselves when, they are really Socialists and Communists. If people knew the truth, they would have even less support? Look at Bernie Sanders, full out Socialist which he does not deny which is a good thing, honesty wise. These extreme liberals also, know, the more people know that they are Socialist or Communist, the less votes they get. That is why Bernie Sanders cannot even put away Sleepy Joe Biden. Biden even half-asleep, beat Bernie Sanders by a mile.
 
The Democrats could have won with Tulsi, but they were determined to take her out early because she wouldn't walk the line with everything they wanted. She wasn't a progressive.

I'd have voted for Tulsi in a New York Minute. I'd have gone out and fund raised and done my best to convert conservatives I know to her.
The left did such a good job of making her disappear I forgot about Tulsi. She, like Mayor Pete, never had a chance. Nowhere near crazy enough.
 
The Democrat party IS progressive. The Republican party is regressive. Therein lies the distinction.

Sorry, I disagree. There is progressive, and there is progressive, as in the Secular Progressive movement. The first is fine. The latter is all too common now a days.

And this is the challenge the Democratic party candidates have. To win the nomination, they have to be really, really far left. To win the general, they have to be more moderate.
 
The Democrat party IS progressive. The Republican party is regressive. Therein lies the distinction.
Yeah, we saw how progressive they are in Seattle. What did they immediately do with their illegally occupied territory? Constructed a wall, stronger mob rule began day one, extorted local businesses for food and money, segregated themselves by race and personal beliefs, within a week started executing the non compliant.
All of this was done with the endorsement and approval of the democratic party. In fact they cheered it on. This is what you call progress? No thanks.
 
Yeah, we saw how progressive they are in Seattle. What did they immediately do with their illegally occupied territory? Constructed a wall, stronger mob rule began day one, extorted local businesses for food and money, segregated themselves by race and personal beliefs, within a week started executing the non compliant.
All of this was done with the endorsement and approval of the democratic party. In fact they cheered it on. This is what you call progress? No thanks.

That's not the Democratic Party that did that. That's an ultra fringe part of it. But the fact that Democrats took so long to publicly condemn it and when they finally did, did so almost completely sotto voce means they were more concerned with upsetting this very violent and extremist secular progressive part of their party than they were about the vast silent majority of people who could have called the Democratic Party home this election. And they will pay for it.

Pelosi - no matter what else you will say about her - is very shrewd. She gets this and this is why she delivered that speech (finally) about law and order.
 
What choices were presented?
Bernie, a communist, so no.
Warren, at one time in her life very capable and qualified. Somewhere along the line went nuts.
Mayor Pete, intelligent, articulate and qualified enough. Too bad for him he's gay and Democrats don't have the courage of their convictions, so no support for gay guy, and he had problems with BLM types. No chance.
Biden, at one point in his life certainly qualified and not too far left. Now a senile old man being lead around by radical leftist types.
The rest of the field not even worth mentioning.
As stated, they had 4 years, FOUR YEARS, and this is all they can come up with? That's what happens when you spend all that time chasing Russian ghosts instead of focusing on the next election and what you might do to bring people together rather than play the division game. Too bad.

So your problem with Biden is that you think he’s senile, right?

Hypothetically, let’s say Biden really man handles Trump in the debate. Like clearly has all of his facts together and gives well thought out answers so there’s no way to truly believe he’s senile. Would that make any difference to you?
 
Yeah, but it was different then. Just like with the judge situation now. Situational dynamics, and all that.

Yep. Reading the news this morning I am actually wondering if I am over exposed with trading equity in the US and should be safe havening it more than I am.

This game of heads I win, tails you lose Donny is planning is interesting times.
 
Back
Top