I'm just reporting what the prop firms are look for based on the job descriptions. I think more firms are going to using teams of people vs individual traders. As Maverick points out.. these firms have to make a a lot just to stay in business. Most of these firms claim to be liquidity providing.. perhaps trading spreads using custom software or graybox systems.. perhaps using "ticker tape" trading.
I don't think that for an extraordinary discretionary trader like myself the game has changed very much. But, there is a big difference between what I do and these firms do. They have a much bigger edge then I've mustered. Its about whether you are in the risk space vs the technology space. If you stay in risk space then you should be good. Profits will be limited to 30% to 300% per year though..
I don't think that for an extraordinary discretionary trader like myself the game has changed very much. But, there is a big difference between what I do and these firms do. They have a much bigger edge then I've mustered. Its about whether you are in the risk space vs the technology space. If you stay in risk space then you should be good. Profits will be limited to 30% to 300% per year though..
Quote from Swan Noir:
Lucias, I assume you mean "the era of the discretionary trader is past and gone" at prop firms ... as opposed to being over in general. Assuming that is your opinion it sounds correct. Discretionary traders are more likely to be directional than those requiring more infrastructure and as Mav points out the non-directional more algo driven trader requires more leverage.
