The Pathology of the Conservative

Signs of Z's stupidity, duplicity, insanity and intellectual dishonesty. A quote from Z.
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:


Reagan was able to bring people together, I personally am not a fan of Reagan, but at least he was able to govern from more of a centrist position rather than from the extreme,

....the mainstream conservatism of Reagan, Goldwater, and other gentlemen who happened to embrace conservatism.


But just one hour later Z has spun a 180 on Reagan:
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
There are some true conservatives whose views remain in line with historical conservatism, but even they often embrace William F. Buckley / Ronald Reagan right wing extremism.

Thanks to Buckley, Reagan, Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell, most so-called "conservatives" are really nothing of the kind.
Right wingers cling to known "misleaders" like Reagan, Bush and Bush, deifying the undeserving. Meanwhile they hate champions of social progress who seek to help them attain wealth, health and wisdom.

They accept as religious doctrine that the corrupt, inept Reagan -- who had 140 criminals in his White House, blocked research and education on AIDS, and supported death squads who killed Nuns and terrorists who killed 240 US Marines -- was moral, but Bill and Hillary Clinton are evil incarnate.


Get on some meds.
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Pathologizing Conservatism

Is it an unfortunate evolutionary holdover, or the product of bad upbringing?

Ronald Bailey


At the recent conference in Chicago of the Association of Politics and Life Sciences, a panel on "Biobehaviorial Approaches to Politics" addressed the important question: What is wrong with people who disagree with the mainstream of American academic social scientists? ....

zzz...I cannot (don't want to) believe that you are really this stupid. This whole article is 100% pure propaganda. If you can't see that...then your critical edge has been dulled to flat.

One could easily take this article, substitute the word "liberal" for "conservative" where they occur...substitute the liberal think tank names with conservative think tank names, where they occur...and you would have the very same piece of propaganda, aimed in the opposite direction.

How boring can it get...this obsession of yours?? MAKE AN END...will ya!

Think about it....you are really demanding more than your fair share of time and attention lately. (like...for the last couple of YEARS.)

It really borders on...well...PATHOLOGICAL.

:D

saxon
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Liberals do not seek or preach conformity, quite the opposite, they promote diversity.


nonsense. liberals tend to be breathtakingly monolithic!

from your article: "What is wrong with people who disagree with the mainstream of American academic social scientists?"

like disagreeing with liberals automatically means there is something 'wrong'.

YOU ARE NOT OF THE BODY. YOU ARE NOT ONE WITH LANDRU.

:p
 
Backed into a corner, Pabst reverts back to what comes most naturally.

Personal attacks...

Yawn.

It is what I expect from you Pabst. Sadly, nothing more....

p.s. I could have edited out the comments you plucked from the article, but as I don't speak for the author....why should I edit his comments?

You really make this much too easy.....

Quote from Pabst:

Signs of Z's stupidity, duplicity, insanity and intellectual dishonesty. A quote from Z.

But just one hour later Z has spun a 180 on Reagan:

Get on some meds.
 
Believe whatever you like. When have your beliefs or comments ever had any impact on me anyway sax?

Quote from saxon:

zzz...I cannot (don't want to) believe that you are really this stupid. This whole article is 100% pure propaganda. If you can't see that...then your critical edge has been dulled to flat.

One could easily take this article, substitute the word "liberal" for "conservative" where they occur...substitute the liberal think tank names with conservative think tank names, where they occur...and you would have the very same piece of propaganda, aimed in the opposite direction.

How boring can it get...this obsession of yours?? MAKE AN END...will ya!

Think about it....you are really demanding more than your fair share of time and attention lately. (like...for the last couple of YEARS.)

It really borders on...well...PATHOLOGICAL.

:D

saxon
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Backed into a corner, Pabst reverts back to what comes most naturally.

Personal attacks...

Yawn.

It is what I expect from you Pabst. Sadly, nothing more....


Hmmmm, no comments about the 180.....

One can only assume Z admits defeat....
 
You can assume....that would be nothing new, i.e. you making an incorrect assumption, rather par for the course actually.

Quote from Haroki:

Hmmmm, no comments about the 180.....

One can only assume Z admits defeat....
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

You can assume....that would be nothing new, i.e. you making an incorrect assumption, rather par for the course actually.

Ahhh, so then the correct assumption is that you don't admit defeat....

So that means there was no 180.....

Interesting interpretation of reality....
 
Oh yes, I am consistently amazed at the way Pabst sees things, how he takes the opinions of others, and would attribute them to be the same as my own.

What can you do?

I generally try to provide sufficient fodder to allow people to reach their preconceived ideas....makes them feel like they are actually winning, that sort of thing....

Quote from Haroki:

Ahhh, so then the correct assumption is that you don't admit defeat....

So that means there was no 180.....

Interesting interpretation of reality....
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Oh yes, I am consistently amazed at the way Pabst sees things, how he takes the opinions of others, and would attribute them to be the same as my own.

What can you do?

I generally try to provide sufficient fodder to allow people to reach their preconceived ideas....makes them feel like they are actually winning, that sort of thing....

Oh, noooow I see. First you called Reagan a 'centrist', and then called him and William Buckley right wingers. And you made that 180 proving your point......

And you did it on purpose to 'provide sufficent fodder' to allow people to reach their preconceived notions......

BWAAHAAAHAAAHAAAHAAAA.....
 
Back
Top