Quote from Thunderdog:
And what do you think are the chances of that happening?
Before these guys set their sights on Mars, they should first prove to themselves that they can land on the moon. Stated differently, they should first try to predict female behavior with their models. If they can achieve that, then they may have a sporting chance at figuring out the markets.
âI think there is a law tying everything together.â
You can't make this stuff up.![]()
Quote from makloda:
Ph.D. in theoretical physics from Princeton University
10% net of fees annualized over 10 years is a big deal in the market neutral space, like it or not.Quote from DeeDeeTwo:
"The fund, which despite its struggles...
Has delivered an annualized return of 10 percent since its 1999 inception,
Began this year with just $400 million in assets."
10% Big Deal. And the guy thinks he's Einstein.
Quote from makloda:
10% net of fees annualized over 10 years is a big deal in the market neutral space, like it or not.
Quote from MAESTRO:
I agree. A lot of people on ET do not understand that making 100% return a month on 5K of capital is a lot easier than making 10% a month on a 100 M or 10% a year on 10B. That "scalability" fantasy does not exist. People would not let you trade 100M or 10B if you are not market neutral! And if you are then 10% is fantastic!
Quote from MAESTRO:
I agree. A lot of people on ET do not understand that making 100% return a month on 5K of capital is a lot easier than making 10% a month on a 100 M or 10% a year on 10B. That "scalability" fantasy does not exist. People would not let you trade 100M or 10B if you are not market neutral! And if you are then 10% is fantastic!
Quote from Spaceman3:
Exactly!
And to the clown who said that quant investing began in in 80s and ended in 2006? Such untrammeled arrogance/ingnorance!