It would not have to be rendered unattainable to cease the act in question. just cause something is attainable does not mean it will happen. I can attain alot more from life but i probably wont attain all that can be attainable. the necrosis i would imagine would change the pleasure or need for pleasure would it not? in doing lobotomies one looses their need to be violent or abusive. this may be because there is a loss of excitement, need or pleasure in preforming viloent acts. the question to be looked at is where the incision of the lobotomy takes place. is it effective if only the prosencephalon is separated.
To assume that "the act" will still be preformed by the individual with necrosis of the prosencephalon is simply juvenile to suggest without proper tests. I would suggest a deeper look in to the topic at hand and preform tests before posting such comments in the future. Some one could google this and decide not to take up the operation to cure their addiction. much of hollywood may refuse this treatment because of your post. lets please try to keep our posts accurate.
also lets work on the punctuation a bit more.
Thank you
To assume that "the act" will still be preformed by the individual with necrosis of the prosencephalon is simply juvenile to suggest without proper tests. I would suggest a deeper look in to the topic at hand and preform tests before posting such comments in the future. Some one could google this and decide not to take up the operation to cure their addiction. much of hollywood may refuse this treatment because of your post. lets please try to keep our posts accurate.
also lets work on the punctuation a bit more.
Thank you
Quote from brisvegas:
grasshopper the prosencephalon isnt predominantly associated with the dopamine neural excitement , we need to look towards the prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens parts of the brain . the necrosis would have to be intense to render mental masturbation unattainable