Quote from Cutten:
If you are a "star" then you will achieve very good results on modest size over a number of years. You will make 20-30% per annum with 5-10% drawdowns. That is enough to raise billions of capital and become one of the richest people in the world in about 10-15 years, if you choose.
Or you can trade the same way, with somewhat more risk, for your own account, and make 50%+ per annum with 10-20% drawdowns. That is enough to become independently wealthy within 10-15 years, or sooner if you have a decent amount of starting capital.
Or you can swing for the fences and trade much bigger size. Then you are practically guaranteed to have a 50% drawdown at some point. Note that this 50%+ drawdown will occur, *even if you are trading absolutely correctly*, purely because of the random factor in trading. If you are risking 10%+ on each trade, a series of 4-5 losers will cause this kind of loss, and this will happen eventually even if each trade setup was a good one. Now this is assuming you are trading well. If you actually start to trade poorly - which will happen from time to time, and is especially likely to happen if you lose half your money - then your drawdown will be magnified. The thing about those kinds of drawdowns is they tend to be psychologically destabilizing and tend to magnify themselves through the deterioration of confidence and the urge to "make it back" on the part of the trader. That is how 50% drawdowns become drawdowns of 80-90% or even a total blowout.
I urge you to look at people who have been successful in the markets. How many of them swing for the fences on a sustained basis? Consider that the more "sensible" traders have still had some very hefty losses. People like Soros and Paul Tudor Jones have all at some point lost 30% of capital during particularly bad periods. If they were trading the kind of risk you are suggesting, they would have been out of business, it's as simple as that. Look at Jesse Livermore - he was a very talented trader, but he blew up several times and eventually it contributed to his suicide.
Part of becoming a star is to manage risk, to guarantee that no matter how wrong you are on a trade, no matter how long a losing streak you have, you are still around to survive and play the game again. You don't do that by betting the ranch - that's what pikers do and it is the #1 reason they blow up so often.