That is true. I think it's the internet doing it. Rising inequality will be reflected in other aspects of society, too.
The Middle East continues to burn, where is Obama?
- Thread starter wildchild
- Start date
I know it's a "conspiwacy" but I think there's specific intent to divide and conquer the populace. There are greater forces at work that have an interest in keeping the status quo. A unified America looking for change is a very dangerous thing to those in power.
Yep. The old problem of entrenched privilege.
Assad destroyed his chemical weapons. This must be news to his own population who he has continued using them on.
can = "can't", of course.
I didn't like Bush as a president. I thought him to be a "wannabe war pres" to impress his daddy. He never should have "gone into Iraq".
Odumbo is waayyyy worse. He really does want to destroy America.... a wolf in sheep's clothing.
He did at the time. Clearly he ended up importing more.
Exactly
You need to look several rungs higher up the ladder.
so much of your response is not consistent with realty.
1. Every non paid leftist and several thousand advisors and a few million Jews warned obama to not side with the Muslim Brotherhood.
2. Yes almost all the military advisors and generals say a status of forces agreement would have been better
3. Virtually no one thought they were nobodies and almost noone thought we should trade 5 high level terrorists for a spy / traitor whose own unit new he walked off and worked with the enemy.
4. Obama's mistakes in Syria were the opportunity that Putin use to assert Russia' role in the middle east... and they have not brought Iran and Syria into a ruling axis. Nothing Obama did from the beginning was correct. He armed the wrong groups made allies with extremists and it was not wise... ever.
5. Experts... which ones... democrats? How could arming Iran and paying them money ever be a good idea. They are siding with Russia.
This may be a little speculative but someday the facts will be outed...
6. As I said nothing Obama did worked out... The way we pulled out caused problems and we probably supported and armed Isis in the beginning. How would have thought that apparently arming radical Muslims would not work out in Benghazi and did not work out with Isis. This is on Clinton and Obama.
1. Every non paid leftist and several thousand advisors and a few million Jews warned obama to not side with the Muslim Brotherhood.
2. Yes almost all the military advisors and generals say a status of forces agreement would have been better
3. Virtually no one thought they were nobodies and almost noone thought we should trade 5 high level terrorists for a spy / traitor whose own unit new he walked off and worked with the enemy.
4. Obama's mistakes in Syria were the opportunity that Putin use to assert Russia' role in the middle east... and they have not brought Iran and Syria into a ruling axis. Nothing Obama did from the beginning was correct. He armed the wrong groups made allies with extremists and it was not wise... ever.
5. Experts... which ones... democrats? How could arming Iran and paying them money ever be a good idea. They are siding with Russia.
This may be a little speculative but someday the facts will be outed...
6. As I said nothing Obama did worked out... The way we pulled out caused problems and we probably supported and armed Isis in the beginning. How would have thought that apparently arming radical Muslims would not work out in Benghazi and did not work out with Isis. This is on Clinton and Obama.