So, we're supposedly concerned about Iraq's stockpile of weapons, worried about the threat of what might happen if they were to start using those weapons? And the way to handle this situation is to initiate a war with Iraq, thus putting them in the position of being forced to use those very weapons?Quote from klutz:
If there is a war it'll probably be over in a day {never mind a week} and then we can look forward to decades of more middle eastern turmoil, all thanks to idiots like Bush.
What's wrong with this reasoning <-- Raise your hand if you know the answer.

