The Irrational, Unshakable Faith of the Collusion Conspiracists

[UsualName]

Let's skip the generalities and just talk about the motherfuckers who had direct decision making capacity to decide where the case went and what the conclusion would be.

One such person was Andrew McCabe. This is the dildo who Comey put in total control and management of the Clinton email investigation. During the course of the investigation, his wife suddenly received 750,000 dollars from the dem party as a contribution to his wifes democratic congressional campaign. Think he anti-Clinton or not?

Next we have Loretta Lynch who claimed to be hands off but was telling comey how to refer to the case and what to do. Hillary's husband, the former President of the United States had a secret meeting on the tarmac with her - that was exposed by an independent journalist. Said meeting occurred one week or maybe ten days before she was let off the hook by Comey. About two weeks before comeys decision, Hillary publicly said that if she were elected she would strongly consider keeping Loretta on as AG. You think Loretta was anti-Hillary.

Get a grip for gawds sake.

The McCabe stuff is in play but you got nothing so far. I don’t know what you’re trying to tie it in with the email thing for because that isn’t going anywhere. For a guy that likes MOUs more than the average joe you sure are curiously deficient on the federal records act. Comey’s decision is sound on the law too becaus there is no applicable law, it’s an internal state dept policy in question. Tying that non violation of a law to a meeting between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton doesn’t work either.

Nice try.

 

[Tom B]

Whatever this one is.

Tom B, or Buy1Sell1 some days are for melancholia and reflection. Nothing strictly to do with Trump, he is just a symptom of an illness in the West. Will the kids at the Children's hospital where I was doing some mini-pantomime yesterday, have a decent world should they grow up.

I'm not usually one for unfair but it seems so wrong that a bunch of mean, grasping and stupid old men are making such a mess of their world

View attachment 180084

Please seek help. If not for yourself, for the people around you. I am not joking.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

The McCabe stuff is in play but you got nothing so far. I don’t know what you’re trying to tie it in with the email thing for because that isn’t going anywhere. For a guy that likes MOUs more than the average joe you sure are curiously deficient on the federal records act. Comey’s decision is sound on the law too becaus there is no applicable law, it’s an internal state dept policy in question. Tying that non violation of a law to a meeting between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton doesn’t work either.

Nice try.

Excuse, but do have any idea what you are trying to say with that drivel?

What exactly do you mean about "the McCabe stuff being in play but I have nothing so far."
We absolutely "have" and it is established that McCabe was in charge of email investigation of Hillary and we absolutely "have" and it is established on the record that his wife received 750000 from the dem party while he was in charge of the investigation. I don't know what is "in play" about that. No further investigation needed. And that being the case, you then say you don't know how that ties into the "email thing." You can't make this stuff up. You are asking how a 750000 payment from the democratic party to the chief investigator of the nominated head of the democratic party might be related.

Unbelievable. You, my friend, need to have a drug test. Complete drivel has come from your mouth.

 

[UsualName]

Excuse, but do have any idea what you are trying to say with that drivel?

What exactly do you mean about "the McCabe stuff being in play but I have nothing so far."
We absolutely "have" and it is established that McCabe was in charge of email investigation of Hillary and we absolutely "have" and it is established on the record that his wife received 750000 from the dem party while he was in charge of the investigation. I don't know what is "in play" about that. No further investigation needed. And that being the case, you then say you don't know how that ties into the "email thing." You can't make this stuff up. You are asking how a 750000 payment from the democratic party to the chief investigator of the nominated head of the democratic party might be related.

Unbelievable. You, my friend, need to have a drug test. Complete drivel has come from your mouth.

So McCabe May be under some ethics stuff but Hillary Clinton didn’t break any law with using a private server. So if she didn’t break a law, how can the two be connected?

And if you’re going to say she broke a law please tell the class which law.

 

[Slartibartfast]

Please seek help. If not for yourself, for the people around you. I am not joking.

I think I prefer when you are Buy1Sell2, more interesting.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

So McCabe May be under some ethics stuff but Hillary Clinton didn’t break any law with using a private server. So if she didn’t break a law, how can the two be connected?

And if you’re going to say she broke a law please tell the class which law.

Heh, you are lost in space Cowboy.

We just concluded that the guy in charge of the investigation has a wife who suddenly received 750k from the dem party right in the middle of the investigation of Hillary did not find any crimes. Now you are saying- lets just set aside the fact that the chief investigator received a bribe and go to what he found. No. You are into idiot territory. The good news is that indications are that the Inspector General for AG is livid about it and has it as in issue in his upcoming report. We need to just set aside the previous investigation of Hillary and start all over and do a serious full ballbusting investigation as Mueller is doing. I don't want to try to fix the phoney comey investigation or agree or disagree on any aspects of it. We are past that now and it needs to be done professionally.

I could certainly say more on her criminal violation of the espionage act through grossly negligent actions but since we just had that full discussion, I will let you go off and read it and sputter about how it is all wrong. And then there is perjury, will destruction of material evidence, public corruption related to pay to play coordinated with crime foundation and so on.
Need a full investigation.

 

[UsualName]

Heh, you are lost in space Cowboy.

We just concluded that the guy in charge of the investigation has a wife who suddenly received 750k from the dem party right in the middle of the investigation of Hillary did not find any crimes. Now you are saying- lets just set aside the fact that the chief investigator received a bribe and go to what he found. No. You are into idiot territory. The good news is that indications are that the Inspector General for AG is livid about it and has it as in issue in his upcoming report. We need to just set aside the previous investigation of Hillary and start all over and do a serious full ballbusting investigation as Mueller is doing. I don't want to try to fix the phoney comey investigation or agree or disagree on any aspects of it. We are past that now and it needs to be done professionally.

I could certainly say more on her criminal violation of the espionage act through grossly negligent actions but since we just had that full discussion, I will let you go off and read it and sputter about how it is all wrong. And then there is perjury, will destruction of material evidence, public corruption related to pay to play coordinated with crime foundation and so on.
Need a full investigation.

I must have missed the discussion about the espionage act. I recall a discussion about intent but it was never drilled down which law. If you’re not up for it, I don’t blame you, it’s a bridge to nowhere.

As to calling something a bribe, like I said no law was broken so you have a major problem with that.

If you have some inside scoop on a Horowitz report, I’m all eyes. I’ve seen nothing like what you’re claiming.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

I must have missed the discussion about the espionage act. I recall a discussion about intent but it was never drilled down which law. If you’re not up for it, I don’t blame you, it’s a bridge to nowhere.

As to calling something a bribe, like I said no law was broken so you have a major problem with that.

If you have some inside scoop on a Horowitz report, I’m all eyes. I’ve seen nothing like what you’re claiming.

I have nothing for you. You like to play the little game that seems to be all the rage on ET. "gee, I never heard anything or read anything about anything including any crimes by Hillary, could you maybe type away for another hour and send me twenty or thirty links because I am dumbphuck who has been out on Pluto for the last four years."

Sorry, if you don't know anything, well then, you don't know anything. Sign up for some courses at your local community college or read more. Several people here, regardless of their political persuasion, come to the discussion somewhat prepared and I thank them for that and try to do the same for them. Then there is a whole crew that pipes up on schedule and says they never heard of how to take a dump so can you post a link showing them. Decide which one you want to be.

 

[UsualName]

I have nothing for you. You like to play the little game that seems to be all the rage on ET. "gee, I never heard anything or read anything about anything including any crimes by Hillary, could you maybe type away for another hour and send me twenty or thirty links because I am dumbphuck who has been out on Pluto for the last four years."

Sorry, if you don't know anything, well then, you don't know anything. Sign up for some courses at your local community college or read more. Several people here, regardless of their political persuasion, come to the discussion somewhat prepared and I thank them for that and try to do the same for them. Then there is a whole crew that pipes up on schedule and says they never heard of how to take a dump so can you post a link showing them. Decide which one you want to be.

I see. This is what happens when you ask a right winger to explain one of their conspiracy theories, they refer you to a previous conversation about a similar conspiracy theory.

Things get tough for you have to form an actual argument based on reality like which law do you think Hillary Clinton broke? It’s much easier to just yell lock her up isn’t it.

Like I said, in regard to Clinton’s use of an email server, no law was broken.

 

[sss12]

I see. This is what happens when you ask a right winger to explain one of their conspiracy theories, they refer you to a previous conversation about a similar conspiracy theory.

Things get tough for you have to form an actual argument based on reality like which law do you think Hillary Clinton broke? It’s much easier to just yell lock her up isn’t it.

Like I said, in regard to Clinton’s use of an email server, no law was broken.

Couldn't help myself. I just figured out where the Trump haters on this thread get their talking points.....The Morning Joe on MSNBC ! Tune in tomorrow boys, get your talking points. LOL