Look back at what you said and look at what the document is, not just that it has the name Clinton in the file name. Do you see any inconsistencies at all?
The Irrational, Unshakable Faith of the Collusion Conspiracists
- Thread starter Tom B
- Start date
Look back at what you said and look at what the document is, not just that it has the name Clinton in the file name. Do you see any inconsistencies at all?
None whatsoever. I stated that Clinton had entered into a memorandum of understanding as discussed- which you challenged- and I submitted a link to a letter submitted to a government entity on behalf of the Hillary and the Clinton foundation referencing said memorandum. End of story.
You are no doubt pretending there was some other issue so that you can slither away from your error.
Don't bother me further on this topic. I have responded more than fully and your dishonesty is irritating and slimy.
Hillary Clinton is not the Clinton Foundation, they are separate entities (except in your head where it is just her slush fund I expect) and the MoU was not between State and Hillary Clinton.
This is why people ask you for links. You are blinded by what you want to be, not what is (far more than most).
This is why people ask you for links. You are blinded by what you want to be, not what is (far more than most).
This might be useful to someone who was never educated in formal critical thinking and is trying to communicate with people who have (though they might not be great at it..).
It took millions of years of evolution to produce people who operate even in part on critical thinking principles. We had a little bit of a golden age of half-rational and fair minded people. You will miss it when it is gone.
It took millions of years of evolution to produce people who operate even in part on critical thinking principles. We had a little bit of a golden age of half-rational and fair minded people. You will miss it when it is gone.
I'm tickling your butt and also reminding you that links are important.
Love the link! Thank you so much. And of Course is wasn't Hillary that enered into an MOU (small detail!). The Foundation files under 501(c3), as I alluded to earlier, and therefore is under no obligation to reveal donors names. But of course donors have that option. Same deal that Karl Rove got for his political PACS masquerading as charitable organizations. I wonder if Karl's PAC entered into an MOU?
frog and others of that ilk make a religion out of being uninformed. After a while I just toy with them and respond with sarcasm, which much of the time they don't understand. It is like trying to teach a turnip how to count to ten using fingers and toes.
Last edited:
Hillary Clinton is not the Clinton Foundation, they are separate entities (except in your head where it is just her slush fund I expect) and the MoU was not between State and Hillary Clinton.
This is why people ask you for links. You are blinded by what you want to be, not what is (far more than most).
Oh boy, you are an idiot on this topic.
The foundation memorandum of understanding was developed SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE of enabling Hillary Clinton's appointment as Secretary of State. For no other purpose, none and you take the position that because she was not the foundation it has no connection to her.
The original post discussion questioned whether the foundation donations were required to be disclosed by new York or u.s. law and someone said no or something, and I merely made the point that there was a memorandum of understanding in place requiring the disclosure while Hillary was secretary of state even if the law did not require it. Hillary may have not been bound by the terms of mou as a foundation official but she was bound as Secretary of State to be on the receiving end and review of submitted information or to see that it was made known to the appropriate internal reviewers. She presented the existence of that mou as support for her appointment and how she would meet or navigate the conflicts.
Yeh, right. nothing to do with Hillary. she was not with the foundation, so everyone just thought it was a good time to do an mou and submit it to the government because. hey. there was noting else to do that day.
Then piezoelectric weighs in to disgrace himself. gawd.
so just to be clear..The wet dream for the Left solely revolves around the Eric jr communications and any ramifications from such ? Nothing else ?