The Hunter Biden Trial

Because the Hunter Biden case wasn’t initiated and run by a cracker local prosecutor in Alabama, who ran for election on “getting Hunter”, with a jury pool of 90% Trump voters, overseen by a judge whose daughter runs a Republican fundraising consultancy.

just the Supreme Court is like that.
 
Because the Hunter Biden case wasn’t initiated and run by a cracker local prosecutor in Alabama, who ran for election on “getting Hunter”, with a jury pool of 90% Trump voters, overseen by a judge whose daughter runs a Republican fundraising consultancy.


Hunter Biden was convicted and found guilty in........ Delaware.....the Blue State that adores and loves Joe Biden...
 
Hunter Biden was convicted and found guilty in........ Delaware.....the Blue State that adores and loves Joe Biden...

That's exactly the point. The Hunter case gives the appearance of being an honest judicial proceeding, whereas the Trump case was transparently leftist lawfare. Seven years of investigation to turn bookkeeping fudges into 34 felonies on a "novel legal theory". At the very least they should have changed the venue.
 
Oh look, Clarence Thomas' "son" and Hunter Biden have something in common.

Clarence Thomas raised him 'as a son.' Now he's facing 25-plus years on weapons and drug charges.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/c...years-on-weapons-and-drug-charges/ar-BB1o2jpJ
  • Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas says he raised his grandnephew, Mark Martin, "as a son" from the time Martin was 6.
  • Revelations that billionaire Republican Harlan Crowe paid for Martin's education have fueled a scandal engulfing the Court.
  • Martin now faces decades in prison and says Thomas has refused to speak with him for years.
(More at above url)
 
That's exactly the point. The Hunter case gives the appearance of being an honest judicial proceeding, whereas the Trump case was transparently leftist lawfare. Seven years of investigation to turn bookkeeping fudges into 34 felonies on a "novel legal theory". At the very least they should have changed the venue.

Your logic makes no sense. To be a pro-trumper, do you have to suspend all thinking?
 
White House won't say whether President Biden would commute Hunter's sentence

Now, just in. They said Joe Biden will commute Hunter Biden's sentence. Surprise, surprise. Not really. Joe Biden talks out of both sides of his mouth.
 
Now, just in. They said Joe Biden will commute Hunter Biden's sentence. Surprise, surprise. Not really. Joe Biden talks out of both sides of his mouth.

Joe Biden, nor the White House, stated they will commute Hunter Biden's sentence. The White House press secretary refused to answer a stupid question so The Hill ran with a report that Biden is considering commuting Hunter's sentence.

Ask stupid questions, create stupid headlines. Welcome to the world of modern media.
 
That's exactly the point. The Hunter case gives the appearance of being an honest judicial proceeding, whereas the Trump case was transparently leftist lawfare. Seven years of investigation to turn bookkeeping fudges into 34 felonies on a "novel legal theory". At the very least they should have changed the venue.


So the New York case should have been moved to another....state?
 
Back
Top