Quote from futurecurrents:
Let's try this again for the chart-challenged jem. We can ignore pspr, lucrum and PT since they don't even present any science or any evidence of intelligent thought on the subject. At least jem presents something.
So jem. Although your theory about what happened is interesting, it's wrong. Let's look at it again.
The Antarctic warmed first (red line) releasing CO2 (yellow dots) which led to GLOBAL warming(blue line).
Proof that CO2 levels can lead temps as expected since CO2 is indisputably a greenhouse gas.
So jem, your irrelevant gotcha argument stating that, CO2 has never been shown historically to lead temperatures is now defeated and been rendered impotent. You'll have to find something else. As expected when CO2 - a greenhouse gas - goes up, it raises the temps.
So jem, being that CO2 has gone up 35% in the last 150 years and proven to be due to man's activities, what would you expect would happen to temps.
Remember ....35%......indisputably the extra in the atmosphere is from man............CO2 indisputably a greenhouse gas...
not much room for an argument there. Which little opening will you go for now?
please tell me how you know CO2 caused the secondary warming as opposed to the same drivers which caused the antartic warming or the antartic warming itslef driving the rest of the warming via ocean currents.
Again what we know is warming in the antartic preceded the CO2 accumulation... what you are guessing is that eventually the CO2 became a driver.
