The Great Global Warming Swindle

Ricter does these drive bys when he has no data, no science, nor even a krugman type mis direction to contribute to the argument.

it pisses him off that his worldview is being shot to hell... he realizes that since the earth processes CO2 and the earth out gasses CO2. And, that even the CO2 high priests like the Met Office have admitted there other drivers like tide and sun which drive warming... he has no legit way to show man made CO2 has caused warming on the earth.

so rather than sit on the sideline and wait to his leaders come up with their new book that will guess CO2 contributes to the other drivers like sun and tide...

Ricter does this drive by.



Quote from Ricter:

You never have figured out it's a feedback loop, have you?
 
Quote from jem:

Ricter does these drive bys when he has no data, no science, nor even a krugman type mis direction to contribute to the argument.

it pisses him off that his worldview is being shot to hell....
Lol, you are so wrong about that.

No science? Does the CO2 molecule absorb radiant energy at wavelengths above 4000 nanometers, or not?
 
Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

lemme guess fc is a chartist?:D :D
But not a very good one. He has trouble with the concept of "failure to break a previous high". :D
 
Quote from jem:

Ricter does these drive bys when he has no data, no science, nor even a krugman type mis direction to contribute to the argument.

it pisses him off that his worldview is being shot to hell... he realizes that since the earth processes CO2 and the earth out gasses CO2. And, that even the CO2 high priests like the Met Office have admitted there other drivers like tide and sun which drive warming... he has no legit way to show man made CO2 has caused warming on the earth.

so rather than sit on the sideline and wait to his leaders come up with their new book that will guess CO2 contributes to the other drivers like sun and tide...

Ricter does this drive by.
Ricter reminds me of Nikita Khrushchev pounding his shoe on the table to get attention. Communists are slow learners by definition.
 
Quote from Ricter:

Lol, you are so wrong about that.

No science? Does the CO2 molecule absorb radiant energy at wavelengths above 4000 nanometers, or not?

arguendo yes..

so what...

show us the science which shows that man made co2 causes the earth to warm.

please note the earth is a complex system which sinks and off gases a ton of man made and natural co2
 
Quote from pspr:

Ricter reminds me of Nikita Khrushchev pounding his shoe on the table to get attention. Communists are slow learners by definition.

yes... right about now he wants to bury us.
 
FC learning the 'global warming' dogma. He quickly learned to chant the alarmist mantra, "Man is causing climate change. CO2 rise will lead to global disaster. Al Gore is great."

jammu_madarssa_061012.jpg
 
Quote from jem:

yes... right about now he wants to bury us.
This from the guy who swore by the "jem algo" for a year, so we've seen your track record. You are doing the same type of thing here, it's obtuse.

As for pspr, perhaps AK47 will repost his track record.
 
Quote from Ricter:

This from the guy who swore by the "jem algo" for a year, so we've seen your track record. You are doing the same type of thing here, it's obtuse.

As for pspr, perhaps AK47 will repost his track record.
Every dog has his day. Unless he is a commie dog like youself.
 
Back
Top