The Great Global Warming Swindle

Quote from futurecurrents:

No shit there are other factors. I've never argued there are not.

Why are you even looking at recent years? Why the sixteen year period. Why not 50 which is more relevant? Do you use a minute chart for a long term trade.

Looking at this chart is the world warming? Is it possible the reduction in solar is slowing the rise? That's my guess. The time period is too small to really disect. It may be that more is going into the oceans. However the dominant factor is still CO2 by far.

Fig1-large.jpg


AGW deniers are like evolution deniers. You know. Morons.


part of the reason we don't use charts as short as yours is because yours is very short term and come in right after we had what is known as the little ice age.
 
Quote from jem:

this is a far more useful chart.

Is the flood on there?

I love the history lesson and the way the chart tells you what to think!

Looks like something the Jehova's Witnesses would pass out in their pamphlets! LOL

images


Oh, and the statement on it that for a TWO YEARS, THERE WAS MAJOR GLOBAL COOLING !! the temps were going down! Oh my! That's even shorter than 16. LOL.

I don't know what's more of a joke. The chart or the person that posted it.
 
Now THIS chart is useful and actually something that someone with an IQ higher than 80 would look at. THIS is the relevant scale to see the effect of our CO2 on the earth's temps. THIS is actual science. Note the lack of a history lesson. LOL

ar4-fig-6-10.gif



Oh but it's from NOAA so it can't be trusted. By paranoid idiots.
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

The global warming alarmists keep pushing the 'crisis' of the polar bears. There is only one crisis that the polar bears need to be saved from ----- overpopulation.

An inconvenient truth: More polar bears alive today than 40 years ago
http://dailycaller.com/2013/02/04/more-polar-bears-alive-today-than-40-years-ago/

Do you really have any interest in the truth? Or only trying to find something, anything, that supports your mistaken and dogmatically held opinion?

From the article

“There are about 25,000 polar bears alive today worldwide. In 1973, there was a global hunting ban. So once hunting was dramatically reduced, the population exploded.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/02/04/more-polar-bears-alive-today-than-40-years-ago/#ixzz2Jz8nvjJZ
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Now THIS chart is useful and actually something that someone with an IQ higher than 80 would look at. THIS is the relevant scale to see the effect of our CO2 on the earth's temps. THIS is actual science. Note the lack of a history lesson. LOL

ar4-fig-6-10.gif



Oh but it's from NOAA so it can't be trusted. By paranoid idiots.

That long statistical footnote is beyond their comprehension. Trust me on this.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Do you really have any interest in the truth? Or only trying to find something, anything, that supports your mistaken and dogmatically held opinion?

From the article

“There are about 25,000 polar bears alive today worldwide. In 1973, there was a global hunting ban. So once hunting was dramatically reduced, the population exploded.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/02/04/more-polar-bears-alive-today-than-40-years-ago/#ixzz2Jz8nvjJZ

Do you really have an interest in the truth? Or are you stuck on chanting the "global warming" dogma that you quote one line from an article and ignore the rest.

Polar bears became a focal point for environmentalists after former Vice President Al Gore featured them in his 2006 global warming documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth.” The bears were classified as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act to in May 2008 because their habitat was being threatened by global warming.

Unger wanted to write the definitive book on how man-made global warming was destroying polar bear habitats and leading to their extinction. He packed up his family and moved north to Churchill, Manitoba — called the ”Polar Bear Capital of the World” because of the large amounts of bears that congregate near it in the autumn.

“My humble plan was to become a hero of the environmental movement,” Unger told NPR. “I was going to go up to the Canadian Arctic, I was going to write this mournful elegy for the polar bears, at which point I’d be hailed as the next coming of John Muir and borne aloft on the shoulders of my environmental compatriots.”

“So when I got up there, I started realizing polar bears were not in as bad a shape as the conventional wisdom had led me to believe, which was actually very heartening, but didn’t fit well with the book I’d been planning to write,” he added.
 
Back
Top