The Global Warming Hoax is falling apart

[bigdavediode]

Quote from FeenixRizin:

dude, you gotta run for office ...



i'd vote for anyone who so thoroughly beats the hell out of these idiots

Except that everything that he wrote was false.

Let's take it point by point:

I see a couple of clear trends here.

1-Nobody even attempts to refute the fact that a whole bunch of CLIMATOLOGISTS cited in the IPCC report have requested that their name be removed, and that this clearly proves that there is no where near a concensus on the issue. And yet, they keep on saying that there is a concensus. Cognitive dissonance on display for all to see.

Here's the problem, the only person I could find who was actually an author who wanted their name removed was Lindzen, and that wasn't even for the current IPCC report, but the one ten years ago.

The articles from various strange websites claimed that various "reviewers" asked to have their names removed -- but anyone could sign up to be a reviewer. You could be a reviewer simply by submitting your name. That's not the same as being an author and is meaningless.

Professor James McCarthy, co-chair of Working Group II for the IPCC’s Third Assessment Report (2001) has reported (see: http://tinyurl.com/2ax9p4, PDF) that:

"Neither [the heads of the SAR and TAR Technical Support Units] nor I can recall a single instance … of even one author having ‘resigned’."

2- Neither do they refute the fact that NASA has called Hansen's work crap. And that all subsequent work was also crap, since it is based on his temp info.

There are two problems with this: firstly, NASA hasn't called Hansen's work crap. Secondly, I'm not sure how you got the misinformation that somehow all the global temperature readings were based on his temperature information, when the UK's CRA also reached the same conclusion from temperature measurements around the globe.

Actually the only people quoting NASA's temperature measures of the troposphere (which have high error rates) are climate change skeptics, as can be seen in this thread.

Instead, NASA says that solar activity has increased since the mid 70's, and is a factor in GW that the IPCC followers ignore.

Five problems with this: cherry picking random dates which don't relate to the start of the industrial revolution, such as 1970, the fact that solar activity has decreased since 1950 (and increased from 1900), your ignoring the fact that temperature has been rising even during the solar minimums which we're at now, the fact that you've turned around that NASA is suddently, neck-snappingly credible, and your ignoring that NASA states that although this has an effect it does not have the majority effect.

 

[bigdavediode]

Quote from drjekyllus:

CO2 is CO2, does heat have a prejudice against CO2 from fossil fuels. The explanations are becoming more and more bizarre.

CO2 does not, in itself, generate heat. Yes, higher temperatures can release CO2 but again, when we're discussing naturally generated CO2 other factors are at play as well.

What mankind has done is to skip right to the CO2 increase which compounds and amplifies atmospheric heat retention.

 

[TraderZones]

Quote from drjekyllus:

Wow, traderzones got someone on spelling and in an internet forum.

wow, drj hired monkeys to think up and type his posts.

this isn't a spelling problem. You responses and your word comprehension belie someone who is not academically inclined.

 

[trefoil]

Quote from drjekyllus:

It didn't prove I was wrong at all. There was a study done by the scientists at Vostock Station who used temp and CO2 data that spanned 420,000 years and it determined that CO2 lagged temp. What part of that don't you understand? If the data is so flawed, do your own study, write a paper and submit it to an academic journal. Until then, I don't care about your bogus version of how the climate works.

How many more times are we going to discuss this? I suppose you are trying the good old Bill Clinton trick. If you tell a lie enough times it becomes true. At least according to the Clinton's it does.

DIRECTLY answer why CO2 is coincident with temperature rises.
Stop lying.

 

[trefoil]

Quote from Haroki:

And by your numbers, 29% believe that GW is natural.....

Are you gonna call them cultists?

Now you can't, can you, cuz by your own standards, that's a main stream view.

And so once again, you haven't proven a damn thing, have ya sport?

Kinda painted yourself into a corner there, didn't ya, numbnuts....

No, my point was to stop Jekyll from his tactic of trying to make it seem as if this was some sort of fringe nonsense.
Every country in the world except the US signed the Kyoto treaty, after all.
For the rest, see bigdave's treatment of your nonsensical ad hominems about the IPCC report. You're nothing but another liar.

 

[trefoil]

Quote from Haroki:

LMAO.

You're getting your ass handed to you.

Why don't you just end your humiliation now and quit proving to everyone how stupid you are?

Oops... cars were the solution for horseshit..... too late.

I tell you what: before I tear apart your water vapor assholery, explain to all of us how that would be a first mover for global warming. I'd love to see that one.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from trefoil:

...before I tear apart your water vapor assholery...

In classic Cornholio style?

 

[trefoil]

Hmm. Apparently another one who doesn't understand that water evaporates when heat is applied.

 

[TraderZones]

Quote from trefoil:

No, my point was to stop Jekyll from his tactic of trying to make it seem as if this was some sort of fringe nonsense.
Every country in the world except the US signed the Kyoto treaty, after all.
For the rest, see bigdave's treatment of your nonsensical ad hominems about the IPCC report. You're nothing but another liar.

drj basically subscribes to "yell loudly" when one has nothing much. That is all I am getting out of his posts. His spelling is not accidental, he really does not grasp how to spell some big words. It is very similar to his grasp of research and science.

Fringe elements here are demanding to know why everyone accepts overwhelming evidence. Their only defense is to attack the mainstream and flout unsupported ideas, rather that disproving it.

 

[drjekyllus]

Quote from trefoil:

DIRECTLY answer why CO2 is coincident with temperature rises.
Stop lying.

Calling someone a liar when there has been no lie told. Interesting. What do you not understand about the finding from Vostock Station?