The Global Warming Hoax is falling apart

Also, if your poll is accurate, that hardly constitutes a cult. Or are you prepared to walk up to one in every three people on the street and tell them they're cultists?
Something that one-third of the people believe is not a cult. It's a mainstream view. And that's granting your single data point. Single data points being all your mind can deal with, it seems.
 
Quote from trefoil:

Also, if your poll is accurate, that hardly constitutes a cult. Or are you prepared to walk up to one in every three people on the street and tell them they're cultists?
Something that one-third of the people believe is not a cult. It's a mainstream view. And that's granting your single data point. Single data points being all your mind can deal with, it seems.
More...

And by your numbers, 29% believe that GW is natural.....

Are you gonna call them cultists?

Now you can't, can you, cuz by your own standards, that's a main stream view.

And so once again, you haven't proven a damn thing, have ya sport?

Kinda painted yourself into a corner there, didn't ya, numbnuts....
 
Quote from trefoil:

If you have nothing to add, which you don't, shut up. You're a waste of electrons.
More...

LMAO.

You're getting your ass handed to you.

Why don't you just end your humiliation now and quit proving to everyone how stupid you are?

Oops... cars were the solution for horseshit..... too late.
 
Quote from trefoil:

I'm still the one who sat and did correlations with the public domain data to figure out, for myself, whether you were right about CO2 lagging. The data proved you were wrong.
More...

It didn't prove I was wrong at all. There was a study done by the scientists at Vostock Station who used temp and CO2 data that spanned 420,000 years and it determined that CO2 lagged temp. What part of that don't you understand? If the data is so flawed, do your own study, write a paper and submit it to an academic journal. Until then, I don't care about your bogus version of how the climate works.

How many more times are we going to discuss this? I suppose you are trying the good old Bill Clinton trick. If you tell a lie enough times it becomes true. At least according to the Clinton's it does.
 
Quote from drjekyllus:

It didn't prove I was wrong at all. There was a study done by the scientists at Vostock Station who used temp and CO2 data that spanned 420,000 years and it determined that CO2 lagged temp.
More...

That would be great if the antarctic temperatures were global average temperatures, but they aren't. That's why more recent studies used 14 proxy sites to reconstruct past temperatures and reconfirmed that the recent temperature changes are anomalous.

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/311/5762/841

Additionally, any lags that exist hundreds of thousands of years ago would be due to naturally generated CO2. Current CO2 additions are anthropogenic and not natural, and therefore that would not apply.
 
Quote from Haroki:

I see a couple of clear trends here.

1-Nobody even attempts to refute the fact that a whole bunch of CLIMATOLOGISTS cited in the IPCC report have requested that their name be removed, and that this clearly proves that there is no where near a concensus on the issue. And yet, they keep on saying that there is a concensus. Cognitive dissonance on display for all to see.

2- Neither do they refute the fact that NASA has called Hansen's work crap. And that all subsequent work was also crap, since it is based on his temp info.



Instead, NASA says that solar activity has increased since the mid 70's, and is a factor in GW that the IPCC followers ignore.

Imagine that......
More...


dude, you gotta run for office ...



i'd vote for anyone who so thoroughly beats the hell out of these idiots
 
Quote from bigdavediode:



Additionally, any lags that exist hundreds of thousands of years ago would be due to naturally generated CO2. Current CO2 additions are anthropogenic and not natural, and therefore that would not apply.
More...

CO2 is CO2, does heat have a prejudice against CO2 from fossil fuels. The explanations are becoming more and more bizarre.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top