The future of the United States includes...

Status
Not open for further replies.
All you do is contradict yourself.

I laugh as you desperately type away, frantically spewing venom in your futile mission to justify your petty, pathetic delusions :p

MRBRETTONWOODS at 07-14-09 02:56 PM:
If Intel was never contracted, the chip would never have been made

Trader666 at 07-14-09 03:44 PM:
You have no idea what would have happened

MRBRETTONWOODS at 07-15-09 08:18 AM:
You can't predict what would have happened, you are revising history
 
To the jaded, jealous, ignorant loser:

This post is not long enough, type more next time.

I laugh as you desperately type away, frantically spewing venom in your futile mission to justify your petty, pathetic delusions :p
Quote from MRBRETTONWOODS:

You can't predict what would have happened, you are revising history. The fact of the matter is that the chip was co-designed by Shima of BUSICOM.

Let's go back to Mesopotamian algebra, if you want to talk about "innovation" "offshoots" again.

I understand that you are deficient in English, let me help you out:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/cooperation
–noun 1. an act or instance of working or acting together for a common purpose or benefit; joint action.
2. more or less active assistance from a person, organization, etc.: We sought the cooperation of various civic leaders.
3. willingness to cooperate: to indicate cooperation.
4. Economics. the combination of persons for purposes of production, purchase, or distribution for their joint benefit: producers' cooperation; consumers' cooperation.
5. Sociology. activity shared for mutual benefit.
6. Ecology. mutually beneficial interaction among organisms living in a limited area.



I take it you did not read the actual sources. There is a link that refers to the IEEE

http://www.ieee.org/web/aboutus/history_center/oral_history/abstracts/shimaab.html

"Masatoshi Shima is an electronics engineer whose work on the 4004 at Busicom and on the 8000 and 8008 at Intel and Zilog made important contributions to the development of the microprocessor."

So the garbage that you are ejecting is not compatible with the IEEE source information.

So apparently it is a troll on anonymous forum ET (being you) who is disagreeing with the IEEE conclusion.

The IEEE is a 350,000+ member professional organization, it is the largest technical professional organization in the entire world. So until you can come up with a legitimate source in this reality your argument is bogus.

Again A (Hoff and Faggin) *B (shima)=AB(TOGETHER created the microprocessor)

and AB=x(TOGETHER created the microprocessor)


Here we go with another "What if?" game....

What if you been aborted and was not able to spread disinformation on this board...

You cannot changed what has happened in the past.
More...
 
Quote from Trader666:

All you do is contradict yourself.

I laugh as you desperately type away, frantically spewing venom in your futile mission to justify your petty, pathetic delusions :p

MRBRETTONWOODS at 07-14-09 02:56 PM:
If Intel was never contracted, the chip would never have been made

Trader666 at 07-14-09 03:44 PM:
You have no idea what would have happened

MRBRETTONWOODS at 07-15-09 08:18 AM:
You can't predict what would have happened, you are revising history
More...

To the pompous BS artist:

The specific chip designed for Busicom, as a product for Busicom , with their instructions would not have been made as it was for Busicom and co-designed by Shima of Busicom.

How do you know that 4004 chip would even have been made by Intel, how do you know it would have been called the 4004? You don't.


http://www.ieee.org/web/aboutus/history_center/oral_history/abstracts/shimaab.html


>The IEEE is a 350,000+ member professional organization, it is the largest technical professional organization in the entire world. So until you can come up with a legitimate source in this reality your argument is bogus.

I am still waiting for your groundbreaking assertion that would prove the IEEE as a fraud and you not a troll.
 
To the jaded, jealous, ignorant loser:

Intel (an American company) invented the microprocessor and Texas Instruments (another American company) came up with a chip at the same time which you conveniently ignore because it's another example of American innovation. You can throw all the fits you want but that's history and you can't change it.

And now you're citing the IEEE whose patents scorecard destroyed your feeble lies about Microsoft. You lose again!

I laugh as you desperately type away, frantically spewing venom in your futile mission to justify your petty, pathetic delusions :p ROTFLMAO!!! You're such a joke!!!

Quote from MRBRETTONWOODS:

The specific chip designed for Busicom, as a product for Busicom , with their instructions would not have been made as it was for Busicom and co-designed by Shima of Busicom.

How do you know that 4004 chip would even have been made by Intel, how do you know it would have been called the 4004? You don't.


http://www.ieee.org/web/aboutus/history_center/oral_history/abstracts/shimaab.html


>The IEEE is a 350,000+ member professional organization, it is the largest technical professional organization in the entire world. So until you can come up with a legitimate source in this reality your argument is bogus.

I am still waiting for your groundbreaking assertion that would prove the IEEE as a fraud and you not a troll.
More...
 
Quote from Trader666:

To the jaded, jealous, ignorant loser:

Intel (an American company) invented the microprocessor and Texas Instruments (another American company) came up with a chip at the same time which you conveniently ignore because it's another example of American innovation. You can throw all the fits you want but that's history and you can't change it.

And now you're citing the IEEE whose patents scorecard destroyed your feeble lies about Microsoft. You lose again!

I laugh as you desperately type away, frantically spewing venom in your futile mission to justify your petty, pathetic delusions :p ROTFLMAO!!! You're such a joke!!!
More...


To the pompous BS artist:

You still have not named the one magic product by Microsoft, and the IEEE has never referred to any Microsoft innovation specifically.

You obviously lack basic English language skills and comprehension, you still lack an understanding of Microsoft's history.

According to the IEEE "in context" Shima did make important contributions to the Busicom chip.

You have taken everything out of context.

You're blatant insecurities, and your lack of reasoning skills is clearly showing.

You are the one trying to change history, according to the IEEE.


Again, Show me the magic Microsoft product...

You cannot find it, because it does not exist. You're a very pitiful loser.
 
To the jaded, jealous, ignorant loser:

This scorecard basically honors Microsoft's innovation. Do you even know what a patent is? Microsoft has over 10,000 of them and for you to claim they haven't innovated anything is ignorant and laughable... like almost everything you write.

Here's a good research project for you. Study all of Microsoft's 10,000+ patents and try to prove that none of them are for innovations and report back to us.

I laugh as you desperately type away, frantically spewing venom in your futile mission to justify your petty, pathetic delusions :p

<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2502978>

Quote from MRBRETTONWOODS:

You still have not named the one magic product by Microsoft, and the IEEE has never referred to any Microsoft innovation specifically.

You obviously lack basic English language skills and comprehension, you still lack an understanding of Microsoft's history.

According to the IEEE "in context" Shima did make important contributions to the Busicom chip.

You have taken everything out of context.

You're blatant insecurities, and your lack of reasoning skills is clearly showing.

You are the one trying to change history, according to the IEEE.


Again, Show me the magic Microsoft product...

You cannot find it, because it does not exist. You're a very pitiful loser.
More...
 

Attachments

Quote from Trader666:

To the jaded, jealous, ignorant loser:

You can pretend this scorecard doesn't exist but it basically honors Microsoft's innovation. Do you even know what a patent is? Microsoft has over 10,000 of them and for you to claim they haven't innovated anything is ignorant and laughable... like almost everything you write.

Here's a good research project for you. Study all of Microsoft's 10,000+ patents and try to prove that none of them are for innovations and report back to us.

I laugh as you desperately type away, frantically spewing venom in your futile mission to justify your petty, pathetic delusions :p

<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2502978>
More...


To the pompous BS artist:

Again, Show me the one successful magic Microsoft product...

What has Microsoft ever created that was different?

What is 86-DOS, What is WordPerfect?
 
To the jaded, jealous, ignorant loser:

You're the one who made the claim so you prove it. And you need to learn what a patent is. And you need to learn how to conduct research. So go study all of Microsoft's 10,000+ patents and try to prove that none of them contain any innovations and report back to us.

I laugh as you desperately type away, frantically spewing venom in your futile mission to justify your petty, pathetic delusions :p
Quote from MRBRETTONWOODS:

Again, Show me the one successful magic Microsoft product...

What has Microsoft ever created that was different?

What is 86-DOS, What is WordPerfect?
More...
 
Quote from Trader666:

To the jaded, jealous, ignorant loser:

You're the one who made the claim so you prove it. And you need to learn what a patent is. And you need to learn how to conduct research. So go study all of Microsoft's 10,000+ patents and try to prove that none of them contain any innovations and report back to us.

I laugh as you desperately type away, frantically spewing venom in your futile mission to justify your petty, pathetic delusions :p
More...

To the pompous BS artist:

LMAO, where is the one successful original innovation out of all of those patents?

Where?

You are boldly claiming such to exist, yet is it seen in Microsoft's revenue or profits? NO

Where is it? Where is the one successful product? It doesn't exist. It exists in your imagination only.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top