Quote from Trader666:
To the jaded, jealous, ignorant loser:
ROTFLMAO!!! The more you insist there's no innovation in 10,000+ patents, the more of a bitter troll you prove that you are. Your claim ABSURD on the face of it.
In fact, it's even more ridiculous than that stupid IIX you cited, your apples to oranges revenue comparisons, and your inability to admit that Intel and TI invented the microprocessor.
It's even more ridiculous than your constant contradictions like this one:
MRBRETTONWOODS at 07-14-09 02:56 PM:
If Intel was never contracted, the chip would never have been made
Trader666 at 07-14-09 03:44 PM:
You have no idea what would have happened
MRBRETTONWOODS at 07-15-09 08:18 AM:
You can't predict what would have happened, you are revising history
Keep it up troll... I laugh as you desperately type away, frantically spewing venom in your futile mission to justify your petty, pathetic delusions 
To the pompous BS spam artist:
Do I have to repeat myself?
Show me the one magic product.........
Where is it? enough said.
You obviously lack English comprehension skills, according to their annual report none of their major sales or profits come from any innovative products.
Show me the product, where is it, what did MSFT not copy, and had successful revenue/profits
Your obsession for claims of "innovation" is borderline pathological. You cannot even name the "innovations" that you claim.
The 4004 chip was co-designed with a Busicom employee, according to the IEEE in-context. That specific chip for Busicom would not have been made for Busicom if it was not contracted to have been made by Busicom, that is basic logic.
There is no mention of any in-context innovation by MSFT ever.
All you do is repeat the same garbage, yet you can't even name 1 out of the 10,000 allegedly successful internally innovated products by MS
