To the pompous BS artist "Trader":
We can go all the way back to Mesopatamian algebra if you want to talk about offshoots. SPARC is no longer actively developed by Sun, and it is only a specification, it started as a brand name, the pre-international (before 20 years ago) specification is completely different and the hardware is not compatible at all, it was entirely new and redesigned.
The point is what is developed today.
The whole internet and computers that we have today was based on the DARPAnet in the 60s that continued in to the early 70s, everything else is simply an add on to those innovations. Once the internet protocol was developed, all other applications that hae been built up on top of that is not fundamentally new technology at all, it is all the same, only accessibility improvements, which by your inane standards is not innovation unless it is American.
Again microsoft and apple have only marketed a brand and licensed products, they have not developed any new technology at all, yet you mention them. There have been other search engines besides google yet you mention them specifically.
The only thing that Microsoft and Apple have innovated is revenue and profits, they have made no technological innovations at all. Your biased garbage seems to apply different biased standards to non-us companies.
You can't even define innovation. Again Define innovation a lot of the companies you mentioned have not innovated at all if you compare it to the non-us companies.
You mentioned Intel on your innovation list. By the way the first Intel processor was actually not even not owned by Intel. A Japanese firm Busicom owned the rights and Intel had to buy a license from Busicom. So Intel innovations are an offshoot of a Japanese innovation.
This conversation is FATAL IN THE END
The ultimate fact is that there is nothing in the US pipeline NOW, so when the currency becomes worthless, and the credit disappears, no one will finance research for your "innovation"
So there you go loser, DO YOUR RESEARCH, you need the practice, or you will look incompetent for the rest of your life.
We can go all the way back to Mesopatamian algebra if you want to talk about offshoots. SPARC is no longer actively developed by Sun, and it is only a specification, it started as a brand name, the pre-international (before 20 years ago) specification is completely different and the hardware is not compatible at all, it was entirely new and redesigned.
The point is what is developed today.
The whole internet and computers that we have today was based on the DARPAnet in the 60s that continued in to the early 70s, everything else is simply an add on to those innovations. Once the internet protocol was developed, all other applications that hae been built up on top of that is not fundamentally new technology at all, it is all the same, only accessibility improvements, which by your inane standards is not innovation unless it is American.
Again microsoft and apple have only marketed a brand and licensed products, they have not developed any new technology at all, yet you mention them. There have been other search engines besides google yet you mention them specifically.
The only thing that Microsoft and Apple have innovated is revenue and profits, they have made no technological innovations at all. Your biased garbage seems to apply different biased standards to non-us companies.
You can't even define innovation. Again Define innovation a lot of the companies you mentioned have not innovated at all if you compare it to the non-us companies.
You mentioned Intel on your innovation list. By the way the first Intel processor was actually not even not owned by Intel. A Japanese firm Busicom owned the rights and Intel had to buy a license from Busicom. So Intel innovations are an offshoot of a Japanese innovation.
This conversation is FATAL IN THE END
The ultimate fact is that there is nothing in the US pipeline NOW, so when the currency becomes worthless, and the credit disappears, no one will finance research for your "innovation"
So there you go loser, DO YOUR RESEARCH, you need the practice, or you will look incompetent for the rest of your life.
