The future of the United States includes...
- Thread starter SouthAmerica
- Start date
- Status
So you are blatantly attacking a post without understanding the post and the companies involved. That is very perceptive.
You still have not shown how the IIX contradicts the overall patents.
You were complaining about how the innovations in foreign countries were all meaningless. Yet why are they so popular?, they have clearly changed our lives.
You still have not shown the off shoots.
Show proof, if you could you would.
Pigs can fly. -I have no proof to back up that statement.
Again baseless argumentation.
i dont know what crack you are on, but it must be strong.
talk to obama maybe he can raise your tax rate to 75% so that you can subsidize more.
oh wait, do you even pay taxes, or get a refund on 10 kids out of wedlock?
Oh please... that was a minor oversight but my overall argument is sound, unlike yours. And that is, it's meaningless to compare (as you did) the revenues of some companies headquartered in four countries with the revenues of some companies headquartered in the U.S. Dispute that
As for the IIX and patents, if you don't understand this have an adult explain it to you:
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2500156#post2500156
On the offshoots you're wrong again. Where do you think SPARC came from for example? Answer: Sun Microsystems in the 80s. You research the rest because you're the ignorant one.
It must suck to be as jaded and jealous as you.
As for the IIX and patents, if you don't understand this have an adult explain it to you:
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2500156#post2500156
On the offshoots you're wrong again. Where do you think SPARC came from for example? Answer: Sun Microsystems in the 80s. You research the rest because you're the ignorant one.
It must suck to be as jaded and jealous as you.
Quote from MRBRETTONWOODS:
So you are blatantly attacking a post without understanding the post and the companies involved. That is very perceptive.
You still have not shown how the IIX contradicts the overall patents.
You still have not shown the off shoots.
Show proof, if you could you would.
Quote from Trader666:
Oh please... that was a minor oversight but my overall argument is sound, unlike yours. And that is, it's meaningless to compare (as you did) the revenues of some companies headquartered in four countries with the revenues of some companies headquartered in the U.S. Dispute that
As for the IIX and patents, if you don't understand this have an adult explain it to you:
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2500156#post2500156
On the offshoots you're wrong again. Where do you think SPARC came from for example? Answer: Sun Microsystems in the 80s. You research the rest because you're the ignorant one.
It must suck to be as jaded and jealous as you.
You have no evidence for your argument.
The IIX is not limited to patent data, it has other elements, it does not contradict the patent data.
Sparc came from Sun Micro, but who mostly actively develops, designs and manufactures it, not Sun anymore. The original sparc is radically different from the one today, it was based on a motorola chip and they are not compatible at all.
You were saying that all the innovations outside the US were not important, and then you mentioned Microsoft, Cisco, etc.
What have they done compared to the non-US companies, compare their "innovation".
The revenue was mentioned, as it shows how popular products developed by those companies are, and how widely they are used, it has had a large impact.
We can go back to ancient iraq and find offshoots.
The bottom line is that when the dollar empire collapses, which it will all of the credit to finance the "innovation" will disappear.
More ad hominem attacks, you are the one sounding like a child.
Technical innovation does not prevent the absolute destruction of a currency's purchasing power in any case.
Think ahead.
Think ahead.
On the IIX, as I said, have an adult explain my post to you because what you're saying here clearly shows you don't understand what I wrote.
On SPARC, you said I couldn't show any offshoots so that was just a quick example to prove you wrong -- again.
I never said "all the innovations outside the US were not important." I asked you to "name all the great technical innovations that have come from outside the U.S. in the last decade or two" -- and you named none.
In addition to being ignorant and having reading comprehension problems, you lack critical reasoning skills. Your revenue example is a meaningless comparison of apples to oranges. I could explain why but I doubt you'd understand.
As for my ad hominem attacks... I simply have no respect for jaded, jealous morons like you. So too f'ing bad. But at least I'm not a hypocrite because you've made them too.
On SPARC, you said I couldn't show any offshoots so that was just a quick example to prove you wrong -- again.
I never said "all the innovations outside the US were not important." I asked you to "name all the great technical innovations that have come from outside the U.S. in the last decade or two" -- and you named none.
In addition to being ignorant and having reading comprehension problems, you lack critical reasoning skills. Your revenue example is a meaningless comparison of apples to oranges. I could explain why but I doubt you'd understand.
As for my ad hominem attacks... I simply have no respect for jaded, jealous morons like you. So too f'ing bad. But at least I'm not a hypocrite because you've made them too.
There is nothing wrong with the IIX. WTF is your obesession? More BS
SPARC as it is currently is completely different from its original incarnation, sparc itself is a brand name and is owned by an organization to set specifications for a processor which is international.
Microsoft and Apple have not innovated anything, all they did was take previous products brand them and market them that is all .So much for innovation.
What innovation have American companies offered without any foreign help?
You still cannot even identify what innovation is, too you only americans can innovate, and anything that existed before america is irrevelant. As a child that is what you must see. You are the premier hypocrite.
Name all the great innovations in the past 10-20 years of the US without any foreign assistance , you're a sore loser.
Show the turd data you have and compare it.
Define technical innovation 666.
To you technical innovation is only innovation that you see fit.
To you technical innovation is only innovation that you see fit.
- Status