Nice diversion troll. I caught you lying misrepresenting science again and you then paste a sentence out of context.. Discuss the context of the accusation moron. We that fact or speculative theory you asserted as fact. You are such a troll.
Next, I am not providing support for my Creator. I am providing support for the fact that science has found evidence of a creator. We are discussing the science of the fine tuning of the fundamental constants of the universe in these threads.
and its not the videos its the fine tuning of the fundamental constants discussed by the physicists in those videos.
You should be ashamed of yourself for lying about science stu.
Tim Folger quoted cosmologist Bernard Carr: "If you don't want God, you'd better have a multiverse."
or
http://crossexamined.org/god-or-multiverse/
♦ Many scientists are highly critical of this approach of trying to indirectly affirm the multiverse. However, some skeptical scientists seem willing to accept this approach because it seems to be the only way to avoid the design implications of the fine-tuning. Polchinski, a leading string theorist, acknowledges that “anthropic reasoning runs so much against the historic goals of theoretical physics that I resisted it long after realizing its likely necessity. But now I have come out.”[6] Susskind claims that “the stakes are to accept the [string] landscape and the dilution in the scientific method it implies or give up science altogether and accept intelligent design (ID) as the explanation for the choices of parameters of the standard model.”[7]
