The fine GOP House majority

Heh, another Biden bootlicker shows up to earn his potato.

By making the same argument, ie. that all this Biden China stuff does not involve any news and so just move along, nothing to see here.

Dream on. The republicans will decide what gets looked at.

I stated that Chinese influence operations involve politicians on both sides of the aisle and have a lengthy history in the U.S. -- and are currently increasing. How is that in any way a "Biden bootlicker"?
 
I stated that Chinese influence operations involve politicians on both sides of the aisle and have a lengthy history in the U.S. -- and are currently increasing. How is that in any way a "Biden bootlicker"?

Okay, I will give you a pass. Maybe you are right.

I fully admit that when I see any post in the middle of the trade day that has five links in it, I just move on.
 
Chinese money has been an issue in American politics for a long time.

Anyone remember Chinagate in 1996

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_United_States_campaign_finance_controversy

The direct spending by China as foreign agents to influence American politics is increasing quickly.


China increases spending 500% to influence America
https://www.axios.com/2021/05/11/china-foreign-influence-spending

China's work to influence American politics via all channels including social media is growing quickly as well.

China’s Growing Attempts to Influence U.S. Politics
China appears to be increasingly interfering in U.S. elections through intensive lobbying, control of foreign media outlets, and sophisticated disinformation campaigns.
https://www.cfr.org/article/chinas-growing-attempts-influence-us-politics


Chinese money in American politics has been an issue which has been around for a long time. However in recent years the problem is growing quickly. It is not limited to one side of the aisle. Both Democrats and Republicans have been influenced by China -- including via campaign donations from on-shore resources being effectively directed by the Chinese government.

The Citizens United Playbook
How a Top GOP Lawyer Guided a Chinese-Owned Company Into U.S. Presidential Politics

https://theintercept.com/2016/08/03/gop-lawyer-chinese-owned-company-us-presidential-politics/

Political Donors Linked to China Won Access to Trump, GOP
Hundreds of thousands of dollars in political donations opened doors in Washington for Chinese nationals with high-level ties
https://www.wsj.com/articles/political-donors-linked-to-china-won-access-to-trump-gop-11592925569





When we stop doing over there I will worry about them doing it here haha
 
I don't see much happening here legally. Special prosecutor will conclude that there were missteps and violations by Biden but that there was no criminal intent. Even though the Espionage Act and the recordskeeping violation part does not require criminal intent to prove violation. The country was put through all that ad nauseum with Hillary's case. If the DOJ wants to let Biden off-and they do as they did- with Hillary, then that is where you end out.

Big winner is Donald J. Trump. The press chugs away every day with articles on why the cases are different. Nevertheless, Joe stepped in the doo-doo politically. The optics are not and will not be good politically to prosecute Trump but not Biden. The pundits and the lefties here will bloviate away on why there are differences in the cases but that is too much to digest down on main street. Biden stepped in it.

The thing that is somewhat nauseating is to hear all the repeated arguments to the effect that Joe has been a good boy by self-reporting and cooperating and all of that. Yeh, okay. But what were you doing with the documents? And what's up with the "I didn't even know I had them" routine. CMON MAN!

It is probably true that Trump's possession of documents was more extensive but he has the "I can declassify" argument that he can make. Again, lefties will argue that he does not but that is a long an intensive legal proceedings. Trump does have argument there with precedent. Joe was VP so had no such authority.

Although Camp Biden wants to argue that Trumps records holdings were greater, Biden be having another special little problem. His recordskeeping, including the classified ones, was within a Chinese funded operation. Which drives all the further inquiries that go with that mess.

Biden not in any legal problem. Trump is the winner there bigtime. DOJ has a sudden interest in downplaying the prosecution of Trump being a monster for holding classified records. (the Special Counsel is looking into that, giggle).

In regard to impeachment. Some house members will introduce bills to impeach so there will be that. But nothing serious going on there in regard real impeachment threat. BUT, again, bad, bad, bad political hit and optics for Joe on this as we go into the election run-up. Joe got self-righteous with Trump on the Mara-A-Largo thing, and King Karma put a giant turd pie right in his face. Of course, the republicans don't have the votes to impeach anyone anyway. If they did they would take out Majorkas as soon as possible, but they don't.

No one in their right frigging mind thinks that if Merrick Garland and the dems had not gone after Trump on the Mar-A-Largo thing that Garland would have felt the need to appoint a special counsel on Biden. So the dems outsmarted themselves on this one.

Biden's problem is with all the Chinese sh#t swirling around this and other circumstances. It is an ugly picture. A lot of Chinese money flowing around the so-called Penn-Biden Institute. Big Chinese dollars dumped into the university and then making its way over to the institute. Or so it is alleged.

His other problem of course is that the dems who do not want Biden to run will pile on to him on some of this stuff under the guise of "equal treatment and no one is above the law" arguments. Some of that going on already.

Oh, and Joe has another great legal argument which he is spinning which is the Corvette Legal Doctrine : "I was holding those documents with the same duty to care and security as I give my Corvette so I met my recordskeeping responsibilities." Yeh, okay Joe. In other words, they were in your garage.
Thnx Tree.
Ya know... one thing I don't understand... is this whole "it wasn't as many as Trump took" or whatever.

So... if I rob a convenience store and I only make off with $40, and then decide to fess up 3 months later... it's ok?

Color my naive I guess.
 
Thnx Tree.

So... if I rob a convenience store and I only make off with $40, and then decide to fess up 3 months later... it's ok?

Color my naive I guess.

Cooperating and trying to redeem yourself has value at sentencing but is not a defense to the crime.

Joe is not exactly expressing remorse. Instead he is attempting the "I know nothing about them being there or how they got there" routine. If it were Trump, they would use that situation to try to bag him on perjury by chasing down other facts and witnesses and squeezing them to reveal who ordered what. Don't expect as much with Biden's situation.
 
Back
Top