If you did I'll give you 100 gold! "100 gold what?" you might ask. : )I may have misunderstood, but did I hear somebody use "Greenspan" and "credibility" in the same sentence?
If you did I'll give you 100 gold! "100 gold what?" you might ask. : )I may have misunderstood, but did I hear somebody use "Greenspan" and "credibility" in the same sentence?
If you did I'll give you 100 gold! "100 gold what?" you might ask. : )
He's wrong and he's long practiced gold buggery. That interview (televised?) probably had commercial breaks with gold sellers. Mistakes are made by the best and he's admitted making them before. Gold isn't currency, hasn't been for a long time.
If you did I'll give you 100 gold! "100 gold what?" you might ask. : )
None of that matters, he can be, and he is, wrong. I could make the same kind of argument from authority, leaning on other widely recognized authorities on economics.Again...Ricter vs. Greenspan....hmm.
Just curious, but could you list your credentials in economics and your market experience so I can judge fairly?
You'll take what?I'll take it if he doesn't - as long as it's gold.
You'll take what?
None of that matters, he can be, and he is, wrong. I could make the same kind of argument from authority, leaning on other widely recognized authorities on economics.
100 gold what?You offered 100 gold. I'll take it if it's still up for grabs, as long as it's gold.
You're appealing to authority and it's a stupid argument. You have no credibility in comparison with your hated... well let's just say a Princeton economist. You're in a dead end.Or you could stun us with your own credentials and how we should listen to your expertise. Personally, I'm hoping you go that way.