but the numbers don't lie
No, but the people making them up do.
but the numbers don't lie
No problemo. To answer your question of what I would have done differently, simply put, I would have used the dimmer switch approach rather than the instant off given the original data was so incomplete. Yes, lives were in the balance, and yes that approach may have cost more lives, but the bigger picture needed to be given much more attention than it was. Knee jerk reaction to just about anything usually ends up as a mistake. We, IMO, went too far, too fast, and trying to unwind that will prove to be very costly, potentially more costly than the virus itself.
What then about the total repayment cost of the "solution" which was implemented? Will that be sloved all at once, or incrementally, you know like installments? Just a poor person asking.Typical approach of a poor person mind you. Can I do it in installments (ignoring the total repayment cost).
You don't get a little bit pregnant and you don't take a slowly slowly approach to an exponentially spreading contagion.
You slow it and get your ducks in order.
Maybe you are, but I'm not. I live in Quebec, and am royally pissed at the absurdity of Canada's worst affected province being the most aggressive at reopening. That is some kind of stupid!Hard to say what will occur when various US states and Quebec open up early I'm ok with them being the guinea pigs and finding out.
omg the modeling involved here...
I've done my share of curve fitting. I wrote the telemetry calibration handbook for a JPL satellite mission. So I've run thousands of linear regressions and generated fit polynomials for JPL to uses in its telemetry database to convert telemetry signals to physical values.
When you fit a curve you want the lowest order polynomial that reasonably gets the job done. When you take it to higher orders the fit is tighter but the function can do some weird things in between data points and when extrapolated outside of the data.
I honestly think we'd have learned more from a low-order fit to the existing data. So of the projections I've seen the last few weeks were really bad. Analysis and modeling is getting a bad name when it actually can work.
I see your edit. Slowing it and getting the ducks in order is exactly what I am suggesting was not done, and little thougt was given to the total cost of a quick and dirty shutdown. See, we agree. The installment plan will be implemented as oppressive taxes for years to comeTypical approach of a poor person mind you. Can I do it in installments? (ignoring the total repayment cost).
You don't get a little bit pregnant and you don't take a slowly slowly approach to an exponentially spreading contagion.
You slow it and get your ducks in order.
Hairy armpits and patchouli oil crowd tend to stay indoors, SoCal not so much.Its being done backwards on the US West coast too.
California has has 55,000+ deaths and is starting to reopen. Oregon, an adjacent state, has 100+ deaths and is closed up pretty tight (they did a good job in Oregon).
Its being done backwards on the US West coast too.
California has has 55,000+ deaths and it starting to reopen. Oregon, an adjacent state, has 100+ deaths and is closed up pretty tight (they did a good job in Oregon).