The Elliott Wave haunts me tonight

If March 2005 was the end of wave 1, then June 2006 would have to be ABC. I multiplied A by 1.618 and came up with almost the exact length of C.

If this is true, then that long arm from June 2006 to February is Wave 1 and we are now in Wave 2. This means the next leg up will be massive.

In Wave 1 and Wave 2, there is usually massive put buying. We are seeing that now.

If stockcharts.com would go back about 3 or more years then I could identify more cycles and say which way I am thinking more matter of factly.

If the arm from June until February is Wave 5, then we would not have seen so many doubters of the trend.

In a Wave 2, there is going to be a lot of fear and chop. Wave 3 should be a massive move.

Quote from hman:

5/3 was the end of wave 1.
 
Quote from michaelscott:

If March 2005 was the end of wave 1

I mean, March 5 2007 was the end of a wave 1. We are now nearing or have completed wave 2.
 
I use swing size to determine Elliott Waves...must be 1:1 of or more of past retracements in trend to establish EW swing. Therefore, unless this retracement goes at least to 1354(107+ pts) we're still in a 5th wave & have more up:)
 

Attachments

Quote from daveb351:

least to 1354(107+ pts) we're still in a 5th wave & have more up:)

Under EW rules wave 3 can not be the shortest wave so your wave 5 has very limited upside if any on that count...
 
Again you might want to do a re take on that wave 3..
You have overlaps the WIII of W3 is the shortest wave again :)
 
Back
Top