M michaelscott Mar 27, 2007 #11 Take a look. It doesnt look so bad when you have Mr. Fibonacci on your side. Attachments djia.jpg djia.jpg 105.4 KB · Views: 146
H hman Mar 27, 2007 #12 Quote from michaelscott: Take a look. It doesnt look so bad when you have Mr. Fibonacci on your side. More... 5/3 was the end of wave 1.
Quote from michaelscott: Take a look. It doesnt look so bad when you have Mr. Fibonacci on your side. More... 5/3 was the end of wave 1.
M michaelscott Mar 27, 2007 #13 If March 2005 was the end of wave 1, then June 2006 would have to be ABC. I multiplied A by 1.618 and came up with almost the exact length of C. If this is true, then that long arm from June 2006 to February is Wave 1 and we are now in Wave 2. This means the next leg up will be massive. In Wave 1 and Wave 2, there is usually massive put buying. We are seeing that now. If stockcharts.com would go back about 3 or more years then I could identify more cycles and say which way I am thinking more matter of factly. If the arm from June until February is Wave 5, then we would not have seen so many doubters of the trend. In a Wave 2, there is going to be a lot of fear and chop. Wave 3 should be a massive move. Quote from hman: 5/3 was the end of wave 1. More...
If March 2005 was the end of wave 1, then June 2006 would have to be ABC. I multiplied A by 1.618 and came up with almost the exact length of C. If this is true, then that long arm from June 2006 to February is Wave 1 and we are now in Wave 2. This means the next leg up will be massive. In Wave 1 and Wave 2, there is usually massive put buying. We are seeing that now. If stockcharts.com would go back about 3 or more years then I could identify more cycles and say which way I am thinking more matter of factly. If the arm from June until February is Wave 5, then we would not have seen so many doubters of the trend. In a Wave 2, there is going to be a lot of fear and chop. Wave 3 should be a massive move. Quote from hman: 5/3 was the end of wave 1. More...
H hman Mar 27, 2007 #14 Quote from michaelscott: If March 2005 was the end of wave 1 More... I mean, March 5 2007 was the end of a wave 1. We are now nearing or have completed wave 2.
Quote from michaelscott: If March 2005 was the end of wave 1 More... I mean, March 5 2007 was the end of a wave 1. We are now nearing or have completed wave 2.
D daveb351 Mar 27, 2007 #15 I use swing size to determine Elliott Waves...must be 1:1 of or more of past retracements in trend to establish EW swing. Therefore, unless this retracement goes at least to 1354(107+ pts) we're still in a 5th wave & have more up Attachments spx_d_2.png spx_d_2.png 305.7 KB · Views: 110
I use swing size to determine Elliott Waves...must be 1:1 of or more of past retracements in trend to establish EW swing. Therefore, unless this retracement goes at least to 1354(107+ pts) we're still in a 5th wave & have more up
M Mup Mar 27, 2007 #16 Quote from daveb351: least to 1354(107+ pts) we're still in a 5th wave & have more up More... Under EW rules wave 3 can not be the shortest wave so your wave 5 has very limited upside if any on that count...
Quote from daveb351: least to 1354(107+ pts) we're still in a 5th wave & have more up More... Under EW rules wave 3 can not be the shortest wave so your wave 5 has very limited upside if any on that count...
D daveb351 Mar 27, 2007 #18 Mup: your correct... Attached, another view. Attachments spx_w.png spx_w.png 13.7 KB · Views: 108
M Mup Mar 27, 2007 #19 Again you might want to do a re take on that wave 3.. You have overlaps the WIII of W3 is the shortest wave again
Again you might want to do a re take on that wave 3.. You have overlaps the WIII of W3 is the shortest wave again
M Mup Mar 27, 2007 #20 If you want a bull count..... Attachments spx_w copy.png spx_w copy.png 30.9 KB · Views: 86