My personal view on both is that only an idiot would say there is no decreased chance at all from catching the virus when someone places material over their nose and mouth. The question is the same as it is with everything virus related - is the discomfort/effort worth the increase in protection, and I don't have the answer to that.
If you told me it decreased my chance of getting any virus by .01%, then I'd say it was a waste of time. If you told me it decreased my chance of getting a virus by 10%, I'd say it was worthwhile. So it really comes down to subjectivity again, and the established proof of how much it helps. Quantified.
I post the stuff from the experts because I find it amusing so many experts say it does not help.
Ok.
But you don't need a research study to realize:
1. People expel droplets that contain viruses.
2. A mask will prevent these "larger" droplets from passing through the mask.
While it is debatable how much of the virus if free floating without being attached to moisture; the above points should be obvious.
The benefits of the above should be obvious as well; this is why these mask have been worn by doctors and Japanese for many many years.
I wonder if surgeons take them off during surgery and whine about how "uncomfortable" they are. I wonder if millions of workers that use them regularly ever just say,
"You know what, fuck it, I'd rather breathe in these contaminants than where this mask."
You don't fool me, I bet you have your mask on right now.
