The Dunning-Kruger effect

pspr · May 6, 2013

I don't think Futurecunt is up for an honest debate with you wjk. He is too busy providing AGW religious material on other threads.

The guy is just a liar and a fool.

futurecurrents · May 6, 2013

Quote from pspr:

I don't think Futurecunt is up for an honest debate with you wjk. He is too busy providing AGW religious material on other threads.

The guy is just a liar and a fool.

It's obvious that I am the opposite of that. So what does that make you?

pspr · May 6, 2013

Quote from futurecurrents:

It's obvious that I am the opposite of that. So what does that make you?

LOL Where is your continued debate with wjk? You just can't debate the issue because everything you have is a lie. What you have posted is just cut and paste and mostly misunderstood by you. Moron.

pspr · May 7, 2013

Futurecurrents, have you just walked away from your discussion with wjk? Can't deal with an honest debate?

I don't blame you because we all know your are just a:

<img src=http://stateofred.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/coward-coward-chicken-shithead-demotivational-poster-1251772047.jpg>

futurecurrents · May 7, 2013

Quote from pspr:

Futurecurrents, have you just walked away from your discussion with wjk? Can't deal with an honest debate?

I don't blame you because we all know your are just a:

<img src=http://stateofred.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/coward-coward-chicken-shithead-demotivational-poster-1251772047.jpg>

Wow. What is wrong with you? Seriously. You should see a psychiatrist if you don't already. Unlike you, I have a life outside of this forum.

pspr · May 7, 2013

Quote from futurecurrents:

Wow. What is wrong with you? Seriously. You should see a psychiatrist if you don't already. Unlike you, I have a life outside of this forum.

That's your reply to wjk? Weak, very weak.

Go back to installing your window air conditioners.

futurecurrents · May 7, 2013

Quote from wjk:

Actually, I think you misunderstood me again. I'm not leapfrogging the science question in my discussion with you. I had simply concluded my comments on the data reliability questions I have. I'm bringing up another issue stating a reality related to the overall issue (perhaps I should have started that in a new thread).

Anyway, I'm not saying that the science is dependent on what China does or doesn't do. I'm saying something completely different. I'm saying they may not care what the science states or be willing to do anything about it if a solution(s) hurts their economies.

So do you agree with the following...?

The fact is that CO2 levels have gone up 35% in the last

150 years due to man. CO2 is a greenhouse gas. How

could that NOT make temps go up? It's a very simple

common sense thing......... that the fossil fuel industry

doesn't want you to think about. The basics of the

science is settled. 97% of the world's climatologists and

all the world's science organizations are in agreement

about it. The deniers just look foolish now.

CaptainObvious · May 7, 2013

Quote from futurecurrents:

describes a cognitive bias in which people perform poorly on a task, but lack the meta-cognitive capacity to properly evaluate their performance. As a result, such people remain unaware of their incompetence and accordingly fail to take any self-improvement measures that might rid them of their incompetence.

You have hit the nail on the head. This describes how someone walks into a voting boothe and say's, yep, that guy that just fucked me, I'm voting for him again.

Lucrum · May 7, 2013

Quote from futurecurrents:

So do you agree with the following...?

The fact is that CO2 levels have gone up 35% in the last

150 years due to man. CO2 is a greenhouse gas. How

could that NOT make temps go up? It's a very simple

common sense thing......... that the fossil fuel industry

doesn't want you to think about. The basics of the

science is settled. 97% of the world's climatologists and

all the world's science organizations are in agreement

about it. The deniers just look foolish now.

pspr · May 7, 2013

FC just cuts and pastes his year long line of bullshit and calls that an answer.

Quote from Lucrum:

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/hyXggq-dvu0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>