The Dunning-Kruger effect

[jem]

Quote from Ricter:

Global warming is still occurring.

http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscienc...9-warmest-years-have-all-occurred-since-1998/

wtf? why are you trolling with this garbage.
that info does not counter the idea that our average temp has not rise over the last 17 years.
it certainly does not show what you claimed.

and consistent with what i claimed is that recently there wer 8 warmer years.... something consistent with a down trend. (not that I was making that argument.)

 

[pspr]

Quote from Ricter:

Global warming is still occurring.

http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscienc...9-warmest-years-have-all-occurred-since-1998/

Wrong again. It must be months now since you have posted anything that is right. You should just give up posting here, Rectum. You can't get anything right.

 

[Ricter]

Quote from jem:

wtf? why are you trolling with this garbage.
that info does not counter the idea that our average temp has not rise over the last 17 years.
it certainly does not show what you claimed.

and consistent with what i claimed is that recently there wer 8 warmer years.... something consistent with a down trend. (not that I was making that argument.)

Is this how you trade, you look at a chart like this one, and exit because the "trend is over"?

<img src="http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/files/2013/01/NASA2012-FINAL.png">

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Ricter:

Is this how you trade, you look at a chart like this one, and exit because the "trend is over"?

Maybe he trades longer term charts, moron.

 

[jem]

Quote from Ricter:

Is this how you trade, you look at a chart like this one, and exit because the "trend is over"?

<img src="http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/files/2013/01/NASA2012-FINAL.png">

totally off point again.

This argument is about the fact that CO2 has increased the last 17 years but temps have not. Which therefore invalidates the models which predicted warming based on CO2 increase.

Since there has been no increase the last 17 years... something besides man made CO2 must have a lot to do with temperature change and man made CO2 must have a lot less... or no effect on earths temps.



I know you understand the argument.

Is it not time a guy like you concedes that the earths systems are complex and that science does not know if man made co2 is causing temperatures to rise.


by the way... if that were a chart of stock prices... I would want to know what the FED is going to do before I picked a direction.

if that is a chart of temps... I would like to know what the sun is going to do.

I would also admit I was making educated guess and would not go all in with transferring my wealth to other countries and trying to cap and trade away our economic future.

 

[Ricter]

Quote from jem:

totally off point again.

This argument is about the fact that CO2 has increased the last 17 years but temps have not. Which therefore invalidates the models which predicted warming based on CO2 increase.

Since there has been no increase the last 17 years... something besides man made CO2 must have a lot to do with temperature change and man made CO2 must have a lot less... or no effect on earths temps.



I know you understand the argument.

Is it not time a guy like you concedes that the earths systems are complex and that science does not know if man made co2 is causing temperatures to rise.


by the way... if that were a chart of stock prices... I would want to know what the FED is going to do before I picked a direction.

if that is a chart of temps... I would like to know what the sun is going to do.

I would also admit I was making educated guess and would not go all in with transferring my wealth to other countries and trying to cap and trade away our economic future.

Based on the chart it appears that warming has stopped many times.

 

[jem]

Quote from Ricter:

Based on the chart it appears that warming has stopped many times.

correct and if you go back to a very long term chart you will see we are in the middle of a big range.

 

[futurecurrents]

Quote from Ricter:

Based on the chart it appears that warming has stopped many times.

I really hope they don't trade by charts. It's obvious they can't recognize a trend or break in trend if their life depended on it. Pretty pathetic.

Also they seem to be too stupid to understand that there is also an ocean on planet earth that has a "small" effect on the climate.

Good luck arguing with these ideologically deranged idiots.

 

[jem]

I do now... but when I was trading for a living the hourly chart was my long term chart.

Quote from Lucrum:

Maybe he trades longer term charts, moron.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from futurecurrents:

I really hope they don't trade by charts. It's obvious they can't recognize a trend or break in trend if their life depended on it. Pretty pathetic.

You're talking to a guy (Rectum) who by his own admission does not trade.