The Dunning-Kruger effect

Quote from Ricter:

If rising "natural" CO2 can cause warming, then why wouldn't rising manmade CO2 cause warming?
More...
Premise 1 is wrong. CO2 follows warming. Premise 2 is wrong on both counts.

Get a life Ricter. You constantly spout nonsense.
 
Quote from pspr:

Premise 1 is wrong. CO2 follows warming. Premise 2 is wrong on both counts.

Get a life Ricter. You constantly spout nonsense.
More...

CO2 can also lead warming you fucking idiot. It's a greenhouse gas. Why can't you understand that? Your stupidity is mind-boggling. Goes for jerm also. I think you morons must be messing with us. No-one could be that stubbornly stupid.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

More...
Found a picture of Rectum's Naval Vessel pulling into port Orlando.

<img src=http://lmstandish.home3.org/Old-times/Images2/Sailing/miles%20in%20sunfish2.jpg width=320 height=225>
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

They just can't figure that out. Amazing isn't it?
More...
What I'd like to know is where this "no warming for 17 years" bit is coming from. If you look around all you can find is that the rate of increase has fallen.
 
Quote from Ricter:

What I'd like to know is where this "no warming for 17 years" bit is coming from. If you look around all you can find is that the rate of increase has fallen.
More...
It would be best for you not to pretend to be any stupider than you already are.
 
Quote from Ricter:

What I'd like to know is where this "no warming for 17 years" bit is coming from. If you look around all you can find is that the rate of increase has fallen.
More...

I also would like to know which they think the better way to judge global warming is, air temps or ocean temps.


NASA_NODC_World_Ocean_Heat_Content_0_700m.jpg



This should put to rest the whole "global warming has stopped" bullshit for all but the most moronic and stubbornly stupid of the AGW deniers.
 
Dumbass. The data set for ocean temps is flawed. Besides, air temps lead ocean temps. Ocean temps are a moderator and nothing is known about the temps below the ocean surface and interchangeability.

You will grasp at any straw you can find. The fact is that most scientists today deny that AGW exists.

<a href=http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/08/22/spencer-something%E2%80%99s-fishy-with-global-ocean-temperature-measurements/>(Ocean Temps) Someone has made a major boo-boo…and I hope it isn’t me. :)</a>

<img src=http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/RSS_mwSST_2002_thru_Apr_2013.png width=400 height=230>
 
ricter why are you playing at this bullshit.
I have asked you about a dozen times to produce science showing and increase in CO2 causes warming here on earth.

that would be your first hurdle.

then you can get to man made co2.
 
Quote from Ricter:

What I'd like to know is where this "no warming for 17 years" bit is coming from. If you look around all you can find is that the rate of increase has fallen.
More...

the UN has conceded there has been no statistical warming for the last 17 years.

It comes for the thermometers.

you already commented on that proof...

why are you bullshitting like this.


Dr. Rajendra Pachauri, the railroad engineer who for some reason chairs the IPCC’s climate “science” panel, has been compelled to admit there has been no global warming for 17 years.

The Hadley Centre/CRU records show no warming for 18 years (v.3) or 19 years (v.4), and the RSS satellite dataset shows no warming for 23 years (h/t to Werner Brozek for determining these values).

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/02/...achauri-acknowledges-no-warming-for-17-years/

dont try the bullshit of blaming the site... deal with the real stats.

did the head of the IPCC agree there has been no warming or not?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top