The 'Dollar Is Going to Crash' Crowd Are Oblivious...

Quote from peilthetraveler:

You see...nobody ever thinks it can happen to them. Especially americans. Look at the USSR. Did anyone see them collapsing (assumming not everyone in here is 18 years old and doesnt know what the USSR is)

Yes, actually many - including many important Russian businessmen - saw it coming. They're now called "Oligarchs".
 
Quote from clacy:

I agree with much of what you're saying, except if that vision comes to fruition, Obama won't likely get a 2nd term.

let's hope so. It would be good for the US if the republicans came up with a viable candidate.
 
Pretty good comments on this thread. I picked kxvid because his view is closest to mine. However I'm rethinking my position.

I agree with your first paragraph. Lack of consumerism will definitely act as a price brake on certain consumer items. The problem though-and we're already seeing it in autos-is lack of demand also curtails production levels. We ain't going to see GM pumping out 15mil vehicles ever again.

The same with housing. U.S. population growth can eat through supply in a couple of years. But what developer is going to build additional units at a production cost above re-sale market value?

The old model of stagflation is less relevant or comparable today vs. the 70's. Why? Because of Asia. So yes wages in the West may become stuck but that doesn't mean that a bushel of corn or a barrel of oil need reflect lessening American consumption or slack Western elasticity.

Global wages and access to global products will continue to converge. Whereas it once took one unit of American labor to buy a gallon of gas vs. 10 units of Chinese labor to do the same, that ratio may go from 2 U.S. to 8 China. Perhaps one day it will reach parity. Bottom line: A dollar of earnings is probably going to buy us less rather than more product going forward. No longer will a Boston bartender be able to purchase a plasma with a nights worth of wages while an Indian IT guy needs to work a month to buy the same.

The best tell? Look at how much more explosive the snap back rally has been in Asian indexes than in the West.




Quote from kxvid:

I am as bullish on gold as anyone, but I still think the dollar crash crowd is off the mark. I think we are going to see a long period of increased savings, and decreased spending. All of which will contain inflation.

I think it will be a buyers market for assets such as houses, stocks, cars, commodities for a long time to come. Despite the massive money printing, the economy will stay stagnant just like Japan, and there will be another lost decade. Yes we will see a decreased standard of living, but alot of it will be voluntary. I don't think we are going to turn into Mexico by tomorrow.

By the end of Obama's 2nd term things might be looking up, with a more stabilized economy built on more sustainable systems. Americans are the hardest working people on earth (Japanese don't count they are machines) and if you are hardworking there will always be a way for you in this country.
 
Quote from Ivanovich:

Yes, actually many - including many important Russian businessmen - saw it coming. They're now called "Oligarchs".

And about 85% of the Russian Billionaires (former) buying High End London Real Estate are now broke. ;)
 
Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:

Pretty good comments on this thread. I picked kxvid because his view is closest to mine. However I'm rethinking my position.

I agree with your first paragraph. Lack of consumerism will definitely act as a price brake on certain consumer items. The problem though-and we're already seeing it in autos-is lack of demand also curtails production levels. We ain't going to see GM pumping out 15mil vehicles ever again.

The same with housing. U.S. population growth can eat through supply in a couple of years. But what developer is going to build additional units at a production cost above re-sale market value?

The old model of stagflation is less relevant or comparable today vs. the 70's. Why? Because of Asia. So yes wages in the West may become stuck but that doesn't mean that a bushel of corn or a barrel of oil need reflect lessening American consumption or slack Western elasticity.

Global wages and access to global products will continue to converge. Whereas it once took one unit of American labor to buy a gallon of gas vs. 10 units of Chinese labor to do the same, that ratio may go from 2 U.S. to 8 China. Perhaps one day it will reach parity. Bottom line: A dollar of earnings is probably going to buy us less rather than more product going forward. No longer will a Boston bartender be able to purchase a plasma with a nights worth of wages while an Indian IT guy needs to work a month to buy the same.

The best tell? Look at how much more explosive the snap back rally has been in Asian indexes than in the West.


The competitive advantage that China and India have is low wage workers.

In fact, even with slave wages of roughly $260 USD per month in China for large company factory workers, they still are having extreme difficulty growing their job base commensurate with the population growth.

India fares slightly better, because of a focus on IT and because they speak English as a primary language, making their workers suitable for CS jobs dealing with U.S. customers.

However, again, their main competitive advantage is low wage structure.

Have wage inflation in China or India over the next decade of any significance, at a time when utilization is so slack, and watch how quickly both nations lose employment to upstart competitors such as Vietnam, Thailand and Singapore (they already are, in fact).

Couple this with Chinese Government's paranoia about maintaining absolute control in an era of dynamism among educated Chinese youth, India's terrible infrastructure that literally requires a total rebuild, and the road to 'parity' becomes extremely tenuous, at best.
 
Quote from ByLoSellHi:

And about 85% of the Russian Billionaires (former) buying High End London Real Estate are now broke. ;)

Please show me the link or fact backup stating that 85% of Russian Billionaires are now broke.
 
how much longer will they own their debt riddled real estate?

I see Iva.. you deleted your post that they own the real estate located in london.
 
There's already been huge wage inflation in Asia. Strikes etc.

And I never said every person in Asia will see living standards converge with the West-no more than every domestic worker has seen their own standard of living keep pace with the wealthiest Americans.

Also, while low wages historically abetted Asian export growth don't kid yourself that Asia is totally dependent upon selling product to the West. That's just another feel good American myth.

Case in point. U.S. auto sales are down 34% on the year. Chinese auto sales are UP 8% and in fact more Chinese will buy new cars this year than Americans!

Sure developed Asian economies will lose jobs to emerging Asian economies-nothing new. Japan was the New China four decades ago. Soon enough China will be fat and bourgeois too. Not yet though.

Quote from ByLoSellHi:

The competitive advantage that China and India have is low wage workers.

In fact, even with slave wages of roughly $260 USD per month in China for large company factory workers, they still are having extreme difficulty growing their job base commensurate with the population growth.

India fares slightly better, because of a focus on IT and because they speak English as a primary language, making their workers suitable for CS jobs dealing with U.S. customers.

However, again, their main competitive advantage is low wage structure.

Have wage inflation in China or India over the next decade of any significance, at a time when utilization is so slack, and watch how quickly both nations lose employment to upstart competitors such as Vietnam, Thailand and Singapore (they already are, in fact).

Couple this with Chinese Government's paranoia about maintaining absolute control in an era of dynamism among educated Chinese youth, India's terrible infrastructure that literally requires a total rebuild, and the road to 'parity' becomes extremely tenuous, at best.
 
Back
Top