The Democrats have become Benghazi Deniers

When you have leftists like Eleanor Clift saying that the ambassador died of smoke inhalation and was not murdered, you know the radical left indoctrination is complete. Another few months or so they'll be denying that a place called Benghazi ever existed.


Show me were she said it was not murder or you are just another deluded wack job righty. Your just making shit up again like a typical deluded nut job righty.

BTW, Who the hell is Eleanor Clift and why should we care what she says? Where do you find this shit?
 
"He wasn't murdered, officer! He died from internal bleeding when a bullet pierced his heart!"

You are, quite possibly, the dumbest poster this website has ever seen. That's quite an accomplishment.


Try some reading comprehension dipstick. I did not say she wasn't murdered. And you have the nerve to call me the dumbest poster? LOL
 
Show me were she said it was not murder or you are just another deluded wack job righty. Your just making shit up again like a typical deluded nut job righty.


Right here jerkoff. Like everyone said, you are by far the dumbest poster on this site.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/o0eDDyQwOpk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
BmUDiydCMAERv8d.jpg
 
Actually, jem and I had this same discussion years ago, but with climate change. I was arguing that if CO2 causes warming, and Man is adding CO2, then Man is causing warming. jem "went lawyer" on me. I used the throwing a blanket over yourself as an analogy, and I used the bullet is separate from the gun which is separate from the person analogy as well. To no avail.

Good for you and Jem. I had nothing to do with that conversation.
 
Comrades FC and Clift have given us some keen insight into the mind of the radical leftist. FC, being intentionally obtuse just can't bring himself to admit terrorists actually killed a man. Excuse and minimize is all he can do. Clift shows us that her political bias is so strong that she will provide any cover needed in order to protect Obama and Clinton. She will willfully ignore the obvious facts, look straight into the camera and lie.
What these two nitwits fail to realize though, that in order to be a truly useful idiot one must occasionally have some opinion that at least skirts around the edge of reality. Even Stalin would be shaking his head at these two.
 
She wasn't murdered? Are you in the same thread as the rest of us? How about the same planet?

I didn't say that dipstick. Try again.

Let me word more simply for you as you seem to have reading comprehension problems.

I did not say (got that part?) that she was not murdered. I merely said that he died from smoke inhalation. Is that so hard to understand for you?
 
Right here jerkoff. Like everyone said, you are by far the dumbest poster on this site.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/o0eDDyQwOpk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

OK, fine, she said he was not murdered. Was it that hard to put up that proof?
Given the ignorant hysteria of the right I assumed she had merely said he died of smoke inhalation and then you nutjob righties translated that into "He was not murdered." I was wrong.



But I still wonder, I've seen this woman before but who is she? Does it really matter what one minor person says? I know it does to hysterical righties who like to get all excited about small things but does it really? No.
 
Back
Top