The Democrats have become Benghazi Deniers

so the white house witheld the ben rhodes memo and had baghdad bob say it was not about benghazi.... because Obama and Clinton did nothing wrong when they refused to send in the military to protect american lives.
 
so the white house witheld the ben rhodes memo and had baghdad bob say it was not about benghazi.... because Obama and Clinton did nothing wrong when they refused to send in the military to protect american lives.

They did not refuse to send aid. You are deluded.
 
They did not refuse to send aid. You are deluded.
And legions of white chocolate rabbits from Mars with green candy eyes will hop to earth and reflect enough sunlight back into space to counter greenhouse gasses if we all vote democrap and pay higher taxes.
 
in the history of all you ridiculous posts... this one is the best.

your team of leftists have done so little good in their 4 to 5 years your presumptive presidential nominee literally can not name one of accomplishment.


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/bMWZeLqwllY?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

You call them ridiculous because you can't handle facts and reality just like in this thread, the contradiction of Teadiots

You have no idea how to normalize data to show how holding GDP constant that a rise in tax rates leads a rise in revenue yet you continue to argue that lowering tax rates in today's world would increase revenues! That is too funny.

Skewed polls? LOL!

The KKK is still an arm of the democrat party. Some people forget the republiucan party is still the party of Lee Atwater:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/X_8E3ENrKrQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
There's a very simple point here that people instinctively understand. It's very possible that a rescue mission would have arrived too late. But if there is any remote possibility that they might get there in time, what kind of leader refuses to send them?

The answer is a leader who values other things more than the lives of Americans in harm's way.

And still, nearly two years later, there has been no retaliation. The terrorists who attacked our outpost and killed the ambassador and the SEALs are walking around enjoying life.
 
we went over this...
has revenue gone up after the kennedy, reagan and bush tax cuts.

The answer... was/ is yes... we showed the proof. in fact after the bush tax cuts even the one percent paid more.

your normalized gdp data argument was some far left (slate.com / or similar site) distortion that had zero relevance to the question of revenue in real life.
we are not trying to maximize the extraction of tax money in a model that can't work.
we are trying to grow the economy. If we can grow the economy and that increases tax revenues you should be happy.


You call them ridiculous because you can't handle facts and reality just like in this thread, the contradiction of Teadiots

You have no idea how to normalize data to show how holding GDP constant that a rise in tax rates leads a rise in revenue yet you continue to argue that lowering tax rates in today's world would increase revenues! That is too funny.

Skewed polls? LOL!

The KKK is still an arm of the democrat party. Some people forget the republiucan party is still the party of Lee Atwater:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/X_8E3ENrKrQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
You call them ridiculous because you can't handle facts and reality just like in this thread, the contradiction of Teadiots

You have no idea how to normalize data to show how holding GDP constant that a rise in tax rates leads a rise in revenue yet you continue to argue that lowering tax rates in today's world would increase revenues! That is too funny.

Skewed polls? LOL!

The KKK is still an arm of the democrat party. Some people forget the republiucan party is still the party of Lee Atwater:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/X_8E3ENrKrQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


The republican southern strategy seems to bother democrats.

but this doesn't. lmao
10150717_10152615949891729_1834497933_n.jpg
 
Eleanor Clift stunned the McLaughlin Group panel over the weekend when she shockingly claimed that Ambassador Chris Stevens “was not murdered” in the Benghazi terrorist attacks.

The Daily Beast contributor, in full White House spin control mode, gallingly suggested: “I would like to point out that Ambassador [Chris] Stevens was not murdered. He died of smoke-inhalation in the safe room in that CIA installation.”
 
Its Gowdy's job to pin the tail on the Donkey before 2016.

we all know she or Obama refused to send the aid.
we all know the military goes to the sound of fire when americans are attacked... unless they are told not to.

The buck stops on Clinton's desk unless she proves Obama overruled her.

Had the press been doing their job, this would already be settled. Who did it --- Clinton or Obama and why?. Crowley, CNN and the media got Obama re elected.

Now Hillary we throw him under the bus... when she runs.

Gowdy must get us the true facts.



They did not refuse to send aid. You are deluded.
 
Back
Top