Well, Paulson wasn't charged by the SEC. The chattering masses can say whatever they like about his ethics and speculate about the legality of his actions, but the SEC doesn't feel like they could make any charges stick. From what i've read, that Fab guy from GS is singing like a bird and this could move up the chain. Perhaps Paulson would be implicated at a later date.
I think if Paulson does have a problem it will be that a jury could decide that these were not "arms lengths" transactions - i.e where is the line between GS and Paulson in this deal? A case may be made that Paulson's hedge fund was little more than an extension of GS for these transactions. We do know that Paulson had approached Bear Stearns to do this same transaction, but Bear thought it crossed a line and would not take the business.
I'm pretty certain that the genesis of this whole investigation has to have come from the sections of Zuckerman's book that talk about Paulson and GS's packaging of these CDOs. I find that amusing.
edited to say: there is absolutely zero comparison between these CDOs and the Rogers index. I can't believe an inteligent person would even include the two things in the same sentence. You do understand that these synthetic CDOs were a zero sum game - they could not exist w/o someone shorting them. The Rogers index is a COMPLETELY different animal.
I think if Paulson does have a problem it will be that a jury could decide that these were not "arms lengths" transactions - i.e where is the line between GS and Paulson in this deal? A case may be made that Paulson's hedge fund was little more than an extension of GS for these transactions. We do know that Paulson had approached Bear Stearns to do this same transaction, but Bear thought it crossed a line and would not take the business.
I'm pretty certain that the genesis of this whole investigation has to have come from the sections of Zuckerman's book that talk about Paulson and GS's packaging of these CDOs. I find that amusing.
edited to say: there is absolutely zero comparison between these CDOs and the Rogers index. I can't believe an inteligent person would even include the two things in the same sentence. You do understand that these synthetic CDOs were a zero sum game - they could not exist w/o someone shorting them. The Rogers index is a COMPLETELY different animal.