The consequences of giving away the holy grail

[gkishot]

Reversing engineering risk , plus time consuming .If anything , i can give you leads to work on , but you see most people are lazy

looking for 250 ticks profit a week option strategy

too much effort , too much time and too much risk to be of any value to me.

Reverse engineering risk? Didn't you already spill the beans for the reverse-engineering nerds? (To look at futures and options prices)

 

[Trading Education Buyer]

The losers lack imagination.To create the holy grail , you need all the information , little information can be dangerous.

Nothing is impossible, the word itself says 'I'm possible'!

You need to aim beyond what you are capable of. You must develop a complete disregard for where your abilities end. Try to do things that you're incapable of... If you think you're incapable of running a company, make that your aim... Make your vision of where you want to be a reality. Nothing is impossible.

Nothing is impossible in this world. Firm determination, it is said, can move heaven and earth. Things appear far beyond one's power, because one cannot set his heart on any arduous project due to want of strong will.

 

[Trading Education Buyer]

We're not talking about the basics anymore. What you're saying is a truism.
In the end you're competing with other traders and you're judged on how much you make.

There 10 year back test ticks only , including 2008

 

[lawrence-lugar]

I understood your post.I was just questioning your risk reward ratio.

With wild swings , you can not compound , it will destroy your account because of large drawdowns.In comparison I go for 0.3% isk to 2% reward , the way I design the formula , if it hits me for 0.3 % , it rewards me 2% .This way the equity curve remains constant.

My personal trading style is mostly discretionary; I kind of treat trading much more as an Art...rather than a science.
I consider alot of variables when I trade. ...and play, or feed, off of those considerations as I watch or monitor the chart during the day.

 

[wintergasp]

There 10 year back test ticks only , including 2008

View attachment 166957

Stop "including 2008" in your backtest, 2008 was a good year for every systematic fund manager ever.

- What's your average trade profit ?
- what are the execution cost / slippage assumptions in the backtest ?
- what was your fitting period ? in-sample / out-of-sample data ?

Regards

 

[Trader13]

... I found it, it will reduce the equation to 5% losers and 95 % winners. ... I use the option formula ...

Sounds like you're selling DOTM option premium. At the risk of stating the obvious, picking up nickels in front of a steamroller.

 

[Trading Education Buyer]

Sounds like you're selling DOTM option premium. At the risk of stating the obvious, picking up nickels in front of a steamroller.

sounds like a loser thinking like a loser and an arse kisser believing him.

 

[lawrence-lugar]

, picking up nickels in front of a steamroller.

That was essentially the fate of Long Term Capital Management in 1998,

The Midas Formula: Trillion Dollar Bet, 2000 BBC options documentary:
http://documentary-movie.com/trillion-dollar-bet/

 

[Trading Education Buyer]

That was essentially the fate of Long Term Capital Management of the late 90's,

The Midas Formula: Trillion Dollar Bet, 2000 BBC options documentary:
http://documentary-movie.com/trillion-dollar-bet/

ltcm was relying on an option formula and were short I am long , my risk is limited

lugar , you will lose your trousers , i never will

 

[Gezunt]

You are a very sick person. Stop posting this nonsense to make youself feel better loser.