The ACD Method

This was more about a former fed president using the term "risk on" "risk off". He talks about the taper tantrum as well. To me this shows the fed is really paying attention to the market like a trader. good insight on their psychology.

Well, the Fed is concerned about their credibility. And the way we define in economics parlance is credibility is determined by how closely policy matches the rhetoric. If the two don't match, then the value of the rhetoric goes to zero. So the Fed has to walk a tight line between what they say and what they do. Yes, they do watch the market to get a response effect to see how the market is responding to changes but they really discount that a lot because policy choices are meant to be long term and volatility is day by day minute by minute. You can imagine how stupid it would be for the Fed to make a policy decision with a 5 year long term effect based on the dow being down today and then ripping the next 3 months. There really is just too much noise in the market to get a meaningful effect.
 
Hey Mav...You are still confirmed negative? I know we all score differently but I would find it helpful (when you have some time) if you could please post a snapshot of your number line and some insight into how you arrive at your bias. The reason I ask is I had a similar confirm on Dec 11th using something similar to Fish's method but by the 30th I was back to Zero and what I interpreted as a neutral bias. I am looking to expand my understanding of the 30d NL concept to stay in trades longer so any insight would be appreciated. Thanks.

On a different note...with the ES trading lower overnite then sideways during the pit session do you change your scoring? Thanks again.

We may not be that far off because my ES NL did get down to -2 before heading the other way. However, I also use a modified 30 day NL which I really like to follow that does a volume adjustment. I really don't want to go into details about that but it's just a way of assigning importance to certain data. That number line stayed deeply negative even when the normal number line got all the way back to -2. So all we are doing here is taking data we already have and re-classifying that data into sub categories. The idea is to peel away information we don't want and extract the information we do want. In other words, filter out noise.
 
Well, the Fed is concerned about their credibility. And the way we define in economics parlance is credibility is determined by how closely policy matches the rhetoric. If the two don't match, then the value of the rhetoric goes to zero. So the Fed has to walk a tight line between what they say and what they do. Yes, they do watch the market to get a response effect to see how the market is responding to changes but they really discount that a lot because policy choices are meant to be long term and volatility is day by day minute by minute. You can imagine how stupid it would be for the Fed to make a policy decision with a 5 year long term effect based on the dow being down today and then ripping the next 3 months. There really is just too much noise in the market to get a meaningful effect.

yep noting the feds prime directive regarding 2% inflation, they are up against 2 very powerful deflationary forces in a slower growing China and vastly cheaper oil, then there are the negative rates in Europe, overall the US economy still looks pretty good considering. I think last time Dalio was on he was saying they shouldn't raise at all based on negative European rates.
 
We may not be that far off because my ES NL did get down to -2 before heading the other way. However, I also use a modified 30 day NL which I really like to follow that does a volume adjustment. I really don't want to go into details about that but it's just a way of assigning importance to certain data. That number line stayed deeply negative even when the normal number line got all the way back to -2. So all we are doing here is taking data we already have and re-classifying that data into sub categories. The idea is to peel away information we don't want and extract the information we do want. In other words, filter out noise.

Thanks for the insight...makes sense. You could remove scoring for those days around the holidays that the markets trade but close early or have very below normal volume like most of the days the previous 2 weeks.
 
another note here, RBOB gasoline is within 5% of the monthly 12/2008 low.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    60.1 KB · Views: 117
Back
Top