Quote from Brass:
Please read my post again. I did not suggest taking a confirmed A trade "blindly without price action." Note that I wrote, "...under what conditions would you not act on such a clearly defined and confirmed breakout, in whatever manner that you do, on its face alone?" (Underlined here for emphasis.) I'm saying if you had the kind of price setup you're looking for, specifically, a confirmed A following a tight range, and then price did whatever else you require it to do (i.e., your own personal definition of suitable "price action," whatever it may be, in that particular instrument), then under what conditions would you NOT take the trade because of some news or other intermarket relationship that you make it a point to study during your 60+ hours per week? Is that more clear? If so, then please try to be as specific as you can in your response. An example might be useful to illustrate the point.
I'll give you an example I posted on this thread just a few days ago. Gold made a confirmed monthly A up. Shan asked me about it. I told him I was suspect of the breakout because the entire commodity complex was getting sold hard. All the grains rolled over hard. Coffee, coco, sugar, all them were getting hit. That is not the best environment to be buying a breakout in Gold. So I told Shan I didn't like the trade. Sure enough the next morning Gold came off 30 handles. Now it still might end up breaking out. All the other commodities are sitting at their monthly A downs. If those levels hold and they lift then Gold might have enough energy to break out. I would be shocked to see Gold actually trade higher with grains going in free fall. There is an example where watching the price action of other products kept me out of a trade that technically on paper confirmed a buy signal.