Quote from mfbreakout:
Risk on Vs. risk Off. I missed FOMC driven trade but CL gave plenty to trade before that.
http://www.screencast.com/t/ziOSIjWFY
and here is ES set up.
http://www.screencast.com/t/kCs1pnh22
Quote from mfbreakout:
Risk on Vs. risk Off. I missed FOMC driven trade but CL gave plenty to trade before that.
http://www.screencast.com/t/ziOSIjWFY
.Quote from kinggyppo:
this is the kind of shit that will end your career, I keep trying to warn folks to trader smaller. This vol is for cowboys only, nasty end of day sell off.
Quote from mfbreakout:
.
Agreed on trading smaller size. With patience and waiting for good risk/reward level, these days are trad-able.
I do not traded as i wanted either. This is for analysis and reflection
http://www.screencast.com/t/aizvxKhhbaR
Quote from mfbreakout:
Someone asked me about importance of 1190. 1190 is only important because that was the level taken out when FOMC news came out. Some traders may have more elaborate explanation. I keep it simple. If at 2.30 pm 1186 was the level instead of 1190, then 1186 is important level for me.
Anything before 2.30 pm is of interest to me. New facts came out at 2.30 and market responded. As long as facts have not changed today, to me shorting 1190 area on bounces is a free gift from trading GOD.
I just get amazed that we get opportunity to short at the same level where first sell off started after the news. I feel for traders who were trying to get long on bounce as a sign of strength.
I do not blame them. It has happened many times over last 6 weeks that after a sell off , E-mini bounced 30-60 handles.
Correction " Anything before 2.30 pm is of NO INTEREST to me", i meant to say.
However, today one thing was different. Due to strength in DXY, trade was RISK OFF and as long dxy showed strength, I am shorting the hell out of 1190 level.