Quote from gnome:
"... And as I've thought about it more... UGMA accounts are probably still "beneficial ownership" to the subject person in SEC regulation considerations.
Quote from gnome:
It's been a while, but as I think about it still more it has come to me the definition of Beneficial Ownership includes:
Spouse
Children
Blood relatives, 1st cousin and closer IF domiciled in the same residence... that could include grandparents, brothers/sisters and their children. I believe this provision addresses the possible gifting of securities in exchange for discharge of certain financial obligations and/or costs of living.
Quote from S2007S:
You think they would teach you in school to save money and put away for retirement, hahahaha.
Nah they would rather teach you how to play dodgeball or name the 9 planets i mean 8, cause thats going to help you retire young.

Quote from indahook:
Yes, But does that apply to the UGMA or just plain vanilla accounts? Once the UGMA has taken custody of the issues the childs owns them. As well as any financial obligation, taxes , cap gains. etc. In this case we are not talking scurting insider trading rules or the like. The issues were owned before the agency the person worked for deemed them restricted. A nice filthy NY lawyer would have your ass covered on this. Whatever...moot anyhow.
Quote from snooptrader:
It's easy to go back 10-20 years, pick a stock with big gains, and fantasize about what you would have made if you put your money in it.
Actually picking a stock that goes up by that magnitude and holding it to reap the gains is a different story.
Odds are you would have picked a stock that went down, or sold early.
Be happy with your Mustang.

Quote from Bob111:
for those,who hate drawdowns(even a little one)-
http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/quickchart/quickchart.asp?symb=MNCS&sid=0&o_symb=MNCS&freq=1&time=8