Trump didn't goose step into anything. You elected Trump. That's right, the left won it for Trump. His election is the response to all the nonsense, all the unparalleled stupidity that now permeates every aspect of our society. The fact that one unknown, unelected judge can suddenly become the most powerful person in the country is proof of a legal system so convoluted and corrupt it's a mockery of justice. You leftists keep looking for someone to blame. Look no further than the mirror. Of course there was that really horse shit candidate named Clinton. What were you thinking? That's the problem. The left wasn't thinking. Y'all were too busy laughing and celebrating. I'd bet heavy money that most Falcon fans are democrats.
Temp Halt gets overturned?
- Thread starter achilles28
- Start date
You're the one who can't deal with the laws of your own land:
Because they don't do exactly what you wish for them to do? Here's a suggestion:
Seems everyone is having problems with the laws of the land. Like Trump being lawfully elected. One small difference though. I've yet to see any riots happening because this presidential order got halted. That would be another reason the left lost. Adults may get angry, but they just go to work trying to find a fix in a sane and rational way. Adolescent minded fools burn down buildings when they don't get their way.
Or what? What exactly can this judge do to compel the president to obey his order?
A time-honored principle of jurisprudence is that judges should try to avoid clashes with other branches, not seek them out as this judge has recklessly done. The obvious reason is that the judiciary has no independent method of compelling the other branches to comply. That was not an oversight by the Founders. The alternative would have set up the Judicial Branch as a dictator over the political, ie democratic, branches. We have gone quite a ways down that road already. Enough.
Let's be clear here. No one is objecting to judicial review, although in this case it should be pretty minimal, given the president is acting under express statutory authority. We are objecting to an overbroad and ridiculous TRO.
You're trying to blame an entire movement of free speech on a few fringe elements. My understanding that most of the protesters thus far have been peaceful. Where's your outrage when the real crazies have their protests and rallies. You know, the Confederate flagsters et al.
The true leftist. Minimize and excuse the actions of the left while exaggerating the actions of the right. Well done.
Aha. Then all we need is one obscure judge to put a stay on the use of Federal Reserve Notes, which are un-Constitutional.
And besides, the duly ELECTED President is abiding by the political, and/or mal-informed opinion of a NON JURY, NON QUORUM of anything...until it is overturned. Or at least they are going through the motions of abiding by it.
At least the President's process is transparent, unlike other Presidents we've known.
Part of that process is to put heat on over-reachers, so they have skin in the game.
If it comes out the stay was entirely over-reached, the judge may have a price to pay.
Isn't that what you're doing right now? You're trying to marginalize an entire movement based on the actions of a relative few. And your view is shared by a number of people here. People who supposedly dislike, say, klukkers, but demand that their constitutional rights of assembly and free speech be protected...
If that's the outcome you're looking for, you'd be better off with a lottery ticket.
Let me guess, the obscure judge is in his appointed position FOR LIFE?
Translation: no skin in the game.
I think the odds are better than a lottery ticket that he has a price to pay.