I don't see how the President does not have authority to stop all immigration tomorrow. The law is clear. Where does it say otherwise? Robarts appears a black lives matter/open border sympathizer. Looks to me this is the globalist push back against Trump...
Temp Halt gets overturned?
- Thread starter achilles28
- Start date
Good idea. Trump should block all immigration and refugee acceptance. Show them the power of the Executive Branch. Stop funding for refugee resettlement programs. Issue a new order every time some judge stays the previous order.
It would be nice if the cuck republicans in the senate backed him but that is probably a pipe dream.
It would be nice if the cuck republicans in the senate backed him but that is probably a pipe dream.
Porter@porter14159 21h21 hours ago
(g) Excepting those situations deemed unpalatable by preening lower courts.pic.twitter.com/qGO3s7JuJ3
(g) Excepting those situations deemed unpalatable by preening lower courts.pic.twitter.com/qGO3s7JuJ3
Not only that, but their appeal got slapped down too.
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...barred-by-travel-order-as-trump-vows-to-fight
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...barred-by-travel-order-as-trump-vows-to-fight
Porter@porter14159 21h21 hours ago
(g) Excepting those situations deemed unpalatable by preening lower courts.pic.twitter.com/qGO3s7JuJ3
So how does the Constitution override this Federal Law? Playing devils advocate...
Good point. Which court orders did Obama ignore, I wonder?
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3446391-Robart-Order.html
Nothing there. Just fluff. This won't hold up. No constitutional infraction cited.
Judge issued a temporary restraining order based on what appears to be a Federal law unrelated to immigration that allows TRO's when some highly subjective conditions are met. The judge gave pretty flimsy evidence for satisfying those conditions, given the relative context.
Napolitano reaffirms Executive authority granted by Congress to temp ban any and all category of persons under national security. This temporary halt was judicial activism. Payback for Bush.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/02/02/andrew-napolitano-president-trump-and-immigration.html
Nothing there. Just fluff. This won't hold up. No constitutional infraction cited.
Judge issued a temporary restraining order based on what appears to be a Federal law unrelated to immigration that allows TRO's when some highly subjective conditions are met. The judge gave pretty flimsy evidence for satisfying those conditions, given the relative context.
Napolitano reaffirms Executive authority granted by Congress to temp ban any and all category of persons under national security. This temporary halt was judicial activism. Payback for Bush.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/02/02/andrew-napolitano-president-trump-and-immigration.html
Last edited:
I read the judge's order. He cited the correct standards for issuance of a TRO, then comically misapplied them. No analysis of how plaintiffs have any chance of success on merits, just said they had a high likelihood.
Bit of joke really. It does show how careful republicans must be in confirming these morons.
Bit of joke really. It does show how careful republicans must be in confirming these morons.