Hope my explanations do indeed help. It is hard to explain things well. I try.
I do believe understanding the contexts of the market (larger, intermediate, immediate) is useful because these things occur over and over every day, on every time frame, in every instrument. They are not 100% profitable as nothing ever is with the markets. There are always the uncertain factors. But that doesn't make it random, as some declare.
These contexts and their patterns occur often enough, and orderly enough, to make profits. I just develop strategies to use for when it doesn't work out, so well.
The key to them working is inertia. The market tends to keep doing what it is doing until acted out by some outside force that changes that inertia. Humans are like that too. Say you get up in the morning contemplating putting on a pot of coffee, sitting in the recliner sipping coffee and reading your favorite book for a couple of hours,.... when suddenly your wife gets out of the shower and hollers at you. She says that if you don't get up off your lazy bum and cut the grass first thing this morning she ain't cooking breakfast, and maybe no lunch too. So, reluctantly your adapt and get out the lawn mower.......An outside pressure changed things!
Why does a range keep acting as it does and extending itself as time goes by? The same could be said of a channel. The market is not random, in the strictest sense. What is random is "when" an outside force becomes the force that changes the inertia. You never know when that wife is gonna start throwing her weight around, making demands! We cannot know "when" such a force will appear. Until then the market chugs along making patterns ...etc as the bear and bull institutions exert their pressures on the market, in a sort of orderly and frequent way. Generally, they trade off each other, back and forth taking money from each other, in a sort of orderly way. One side wins for a while then the other wins. This interaction basically draws the chart and creates the contexts mentioned above. And these contexts are there in every TF.
And because of inertia, which is a reflection too of human nature, as humans like order...tradition...the market too needs some sort of order to make it tradeable therefore, tends to continue doing what it is doing. Inertia. Imagine if all day long it just shot straight up and then straight down. It would be psychologically a roller coaster ride. Not that it couldn't be profitable doing so…ROFLMAO. Most traders would stay away from it. There has to be some sort of order if people are going to become market participants. That order in the markets in rooted in human psychology, nature, and behavior. It has to be because it is humans not monkeys or chimpanzees that are trading the markets. All market participants are humans with human nature encoded within our DNA. We don’t respond to events as frogs or insects or any other creatures. Each has it own nature. And that nature leaves it’s fingerprint on everything it touches.
View attachment 263661
View attachment 263662
Whatever we, as humans touch, we leave our footprints. Even the algos we write for trading will reflect out human nature. That is why the markets have always had PB's, triangles, trends, BO's, channels, wedges...etc ad nauseum.. and they ALWAYS will. We humans cannot long survive in total chaos and complete disorder. Wars may start. They will end. Riots may start but they will always cease as time goes by. Riots and wars in trading will start but it will always come back to order. Do you catch my drift? It is human nature. We need order. We need tradition. We need habits. We need customs. Without these things we would be so stressed out we would become neurotic. Some do any way day trading LOL.
See, our minds create shortcuts and bias to help us so we don't have to analyze everything, every time, down to the minute detail. Can you imagine if you were trying to decide if a restaurant is a good eating place that you would sit up a table outside the door taking an extensive survey from everyone going in, and coming out, before you could make up your mind that it is likely a good eating place? No, our mind tends to make assumptions thus it looks for shortcuts. It relieves us of tremendous amounts of stress that would be created when making decisions. Life would be unbearable if had to focus so much extreme attention, on every little detail, about everything, before we could make a decision. The flip side is not enough focus on detail can be just as bad.
These mental shortcuts. Take for instance, a dining experience. We drive by a restaurant and a visual glance ...the building looks clean and in order...parking looks orderly...many many cars are there...people waiting outside to get seated...our mind passes judgement and then rather quickly makes assumptions that the restaurant must have a) good service and b) good food and c) decent prices so we wheel into the parking lot and await to get seated. Now, that doesn't mean we will have a good experience! It just means that a good experience is a likely POSSIBILITY. We could get seated and get a new waiter that doesn't know how to do his job yet. The cook could overcook our steak. The customers sitting next to us could be loud and boisterous thus ruining our meal. They might run out of our favorite beer. See, any amount of variables can throw a monkey wrench in the gears of a good dining experience.
Well it is the same thing with trading. The clean building...nice parking lot...amount of cars...amount of people in line to get in.. these are the contexts, if you will, in trading. This is reflective of the inertia. When I get in the restaurant and actually get down to ordering and eating well these things are the dynamics of my dining experience. Likewise, when I get in a trade (i.e. placing my dining order) now comes the dynamics. How is that trade panning out? How is that dining experience going? Anything could go wrong and ruin my dining experience. Anything could go wrong and ruin my trade. It doesn't mean the restaurant is bad. It doesn't mean the context and patterns are useless in trading. It just means something happened that generally doesn't happen and it ruined my dining experience and my trading strategies. So I leave in a huff and refuse to eat at that restaurant again. Furthermore, I tell my friends to never eat there. In addition, I get on a forum about dining experiences and blast the restaurant. Others respond saying how they had a wonderful experience there. So, I leave day trading, get on a trading forum and blast day trading ...talking about it, how it, with all it's patterns and setups, is worthless and at best a 50/50 proposition. Sound familiar?
Inertia. See, until a strong enough force acts to change the inertia (the tradition, the customs) tend to prevail. Things just move along in a sort of orderly way. Channels form and appear as containers of price action because of institutions trying to exert themselves and take money from each other. It isn't that they are all sitting there looking at 5 min charts. No, they are looking at other TF's. Some daily. Some weekly. Some monthly. Some hourly. Some maybe 15 min. Some HFT's trading even less TF's than say 5 min time frames. Some aren't looking at charts at all. They just doing what they are doing filling orders but ALL that action, together, appears on the charts, in the forms of patterns and the different contexts that are being created on different TF's, as the session rolls along.
For instance, a bull channel on a 5 minute chart may simply appear as a bear flag on a one hour chart that has price in a bear trend.
I trade the patterns and the contexts on the time frame I am looking at. If I am trading the 5 minute chart I will trade the channel using channel trading techniques and setups. If I am trading the one hour chart I trade is as a PB showing up as a bear flag looking for a continuation south. Once that hourly PB resumes south from the bear flag it will show up on that hourly chart. On the 5 min chart, it will show up as a BO south of the channel. I occasionally will glance at a larger TF just to see the 3 contexts in it but I like trading the 5 min because of the amount of trades it renders me, during a typical trading session. I am a scalper. So 5 minute charts fits me. By trading size on smaller price movements (what many consider as noise) I can extract profits often very fast, and quit for the day.
The way I see it is the longer my money is actually in the market the longer it is at risk. It can't be at risk when it is out of the market. Many folks have lost their life savings in mutual funds..etc. Others have made a lot of money. Both had their money at risk over large periods of time. I prefer to just extract quick profits and be flat at the end of the session. Others hate the attention and time and energy invested in details to day trade. Neither side is right or wrong. But usually one side will denounce the other as untenable.
Granted intraday trading does require more understanding, and more attention to detail. And more decision making. Each decision has stress related to it. Some folks aren't cut out for it. But that doesn't make it wrong for everyone.
Going to garden. Have a good weekend.
PS while learning to trade using PA (price action) techniques may seem complicated , detailed oriented, too complex, chaotic, and an energy sapper. But remember, that the more one learns how and the more one PRACTICES the more it becomes second nature, and the less energy it takes to decide. It thus becomes easier to read PA and to make a decision. And the stress comes from the energy expended to make a decision and face the dynamics that come after that decision is made.
I have no fear losing any edge. Or telling how I trade. Most are never going to put in the PRACTICE necessary for day trading to become second nature for them. It took me a long time to buckle down and get serious about it instead of just monkeying around with it.