Techniques for Day Trading the ES, NQ, YM, MES, MNQ, and MYM

Hope my explanations do indeed help. It is hard to explain things well. I try.
I do believe understanding the contexts of the market (larger, intermediate, immediate) is useful because these things occur over and over every day, on every time frame, in every instrument. They are not 100% profitable as nothing ever is with the markets. There are always the uncertain factors. But that doesn't make it random, as some declare.

These contexts and their patterns occur often enough, and orderly enough, to make profits. I just develop strategies to use for when it doesn't work out, so well.

The key to them working is inertia. The market tends to keep doing what it is doing until acted out by some outside force that changes that inertia. Humans are like that too. Say you get up in the morning contemplating putting on a pot of coffee, sitting in the recliner sipping coffee and reading your favorite book for a couple of hours,.... when suddenly your wife gets out of the shower and hollers at you. She says that if you don't get up off your lazy bum and cut the grass first thing this morning she ain't cooking breakfast, and maybe no lunch too. So, reluctantly your adapt and get out the lawn mower.......An outside pressure changed things!

Why does a range keep acting as it does and extending itself as time goes by? The same could be said of a channel. The market is not random, in the strictest sense. What is random is "when" an outside force becomes the force that changes the inertia. You never know when that wife is gonna start throwing her weight around, making demands! We cannot know "when" such a force will appear. Until then the market chugs along making patterns ...etc as the bear and bull institutions exert their pressures on the market, in a sort of orderly and frequent way. Generally, they trade off each other, back and forth taking money from each other, in a sort of orderly way. One side wins for a while then the other wins. This interaction basically draws the chart and creates the contexts mentioned above. And these contexts are there in every TF.

And because of inertia, which is a reflection too of human nature, as humans like order...tradition...the market too needs some sort of order to make it tradeable therefore, tends to continue doing what it is doing. Inertia. Imagine if all day long it just shot straight up and then straight down. It would be psychologically a roller coaster ride. Not that it couldn't be profitable doing so…ROFLMAO. Most traders would stay away from it. There has to be some sort of order if people are going to become market participants. That order in the markets in rooted in human psychology, nature, and behavior. It has to be because it is humans not monkeys or chimpanzees that are trading the markets. All market participants are humans with human nature encoded within our DNA. We don’t respond to events as frogs or insects or any other creatures. Each has it own nature. And that nature leaves it’s fingerprint on everything it touches.

View attachment 263661


View attachment 263662


Whatever we, as humans touch, we leave our footprints. Even the algos we write for trading will reflect out human nature. That is why the markets have always had PB's, triangles, trends, BO's, channels, wedges...etc ad nauseum.. and they ALWAYS will. We humans cannot long survive in total chaos and complete disorder. Wars may start. They will end. Riots may start but they will always cease as time goes by. Riots and wars in trading will start but it will always come back to order. Do you catch my drift? It is human nature. We need order. We need tradition. We need habits. We need customs. Without these things we would be so stressed out we would become neurotic. Some do any way day trading LOL.

See, our minds create shortcuts and bias to help us so we don't have to analyze everything, every time, down to the minute detail. Can you imagine if you were trying to decide if a restaurant is a good eating place that you would sit up a table outside the door taking an extensive survey from everyone going in, and coming out, before you could make up your mind that it is likely a good eating place? No, our mind tends to make assumptions thus it looks for shortcuts. It relieves us of tremendous amounts of stress that would be created when making decisions. Life would be unbearable if had to focus so much extreme attention, on every little detail, about everything, before we could make a decision. The flip side is not enough focus on detail can be just as bad.

These mental shortcuts. Take for instance, a dining experience. We drive by a restaurant and a visual glance ...the building looks clean and in order...parking looks orderly...many many cars are there...people waiting outside to get seated...our mind passes judgement and then rather quickly makes assumptions that the restaurant must have a) good service and b) good food and c) decent prices so we wheel into the parking lot and await to get seated. Now, that doesn't mean we will have a good experience! It just means that a good experience is a likely POSSIBILITY. We could get seated and get a new waiter that doesn't know how to do his job yet. The cook could overcook our steak. The customers sitting next to us could be loud and boisterous thus ruining our meal. They might run out of our favorite beer. See, any amount of variables can throw a monkey wrench in the gears of a good dining experience.

Well it is the same thing with trading. The clean building...nice parking lot...amount of cars...amount of people in line to get in.. these are the contexts, if you will, in trading. This is reflective of the inertia. When I get in the restaurant and actually get down to ordering and eating well these things are the dynamics of my dining experience. Likewise, when I get in a trade (i.e. placing my dining order) now comes the dynamics. How is that trade panning out? How is that dining experience going? Anything could go wrong and ruin my dining experience. Anything could go wrong and ruin my trade. It doesn't mean the restaurant is bad. It doesn't mean the context and patterns are useless in trading. It just means something happened that generally doesn't happen and it ruined my dining experience and my trading strategies. So I leave in a huff and refuse to eat at that restaurant again. Furthermore, I tell my friends to never eat there. In addition, I get on a forum about dining experiences and blast the restaurant. Others respond saying how they had a wonderful experience there. So, I leave day trading, get on a trading forum and blast day trading ...talking about it, how it, with all it's patterns and setups, is worthless and at best a 50/50 proposition. Sound familiar?

Inertia. See, until a strong enough force acts to change the inertia (the tradition, the customs) tend to prevail. Things just move along in a sort of orderly way. Channels form and appear as containers of price action because of institutions trying to exert themselves and take money from each other. It isn't that they are all sitting there looking at 5 min charts. No, they are looking at other TF's. Some daily. Some weekly. Some monthly. Some hourly. Some maybe 15 min. Some HFT's trading even less TF's than say 5 min time frames. Some aren't looking at charts at all. They just doing what they are doing filling orders but ALL that action, together, appears on the charts, in the forms of patterns and the different contexts that are being created on different TF's, as the session rolls along.

For instance, a bull channel on a 5 minute chart may simply appear as a bear flag on a one hour chart that has price in a bear trend. I trade the patterns and the contexts on the time frame I am looking at. If I am trading the 5 minute chart I will trade the channel using channel trading techniques and setups. If I am trading the one hour chart I trade is as a PB showing up as a bear flag looking for a continuation south. Once that hourly PB resumes south from the bear flag it will show up on that hourly chart. On the 5 min chart, it will show up as a BO south of the channel. I occasionally will glance at a larger TF just to see the 3 contexts in it but I like trading the 5 min because of the amount of trades it renders me, during a typical trading session. I am a scalper. So 5 minute charts fits me. By trading size on smaller price movements (what many consider as noise) I can extract profits often very fast, and quit for the day.

The way I see it is the longer my money is actually in the market the longer it is at risk. It can't be at risk when it is out of the market. Many folks have lost their life savings in mutual funds..etc. Others have made a lot of money. Both had their money at risk over large periods of time. I prefer to just extract quick profits and be flat at the end of the session. Others hate the attention and time and energy invested in details to day trade. Neither side is right or wrong. But usually one side will denounce the other as untenable.

Granted intraday trading does require more understanding, and more attention to detail. And more decision making. Each decision has stress related to it. Some folks aren't cut out for it. But that doesn't make it wrong for everyone.

Going to garden. Have a good weekend.

PS while learning to trade using PA (price action) techniques may seem complicated , detailed oriented, too complex, chaotic, and an energy sapper. But remember, that the more one learns how and the more one PRACTICES the more it becomes second nature, and the less energy it takes to decide. It thus becomes easier to read PA and to make a decision. And the stress comes from the energy expended to make a decision and face the dynamics that come after that decision is made.

I have no fear losing any edge. Or telling how I trade. Most are never going to put in the PRACTICE necessary for day trading to become second nature for them. It took me a long time to buckle down and get serious about it instead of just monkeying around with it.
Hello volpri,

Thank you thank you thank you thank you. You are amazing sir. I really appreciate your time and effort and helping us price action trading. It is greatly appreciated.
 
WILLPOWER IS NOT THE KEY TO FORMING A NEW HABIT. How many of us have exerted our willpower Jan 1…year….to little or no avail?

REPETITION IS THE KEY to forming habits.

PRACTICE is the key to doing repetitions.

SIM is the key to practice! I always say SIM it!
Hello volpri,

You are a good man.

What are you thoughts on this when it comes to practice and repetition in sim:

"PRACTICE is the key to doing repetitions rather winning or losing and the PnL in sim is -$X,XXX"

I have a bad habit of stopping sim trading when my account balance is going into drawdown. Staying consistent when losing or winning I think is important too when practicing. the losses will come.
 
I wish there was a better way, @volpri to express my appreciation for your kind. and huge amount of time and effort that you provide without charge share your experience and wisdom of trading the futures markets -- than to just push the "like" button.
 
I wish there was a better way, @volpri to express my appreciation for your kind. and huge amount of time and effort that you provide without charge share your experience and wisdom of trading the futures markets -- than to just push the "like" button.
Yes, I agree MACD. He is helpful.
 
WILLPOWER IS NOT THE KEY TO FORMING A NEW HABIT. How many of us have exerted our willpower Jan 1…year….to little or no avail?

REPETITION IS THE KEY to forming habits.

PRACTICE is the key to doing repetitions.

SIM is the key to practice! I always say SIM it!

Can you give a breakdown on what your comms vs profits are? Win/loss rates
 
The market cycle is, again:

Starts with a BO that moves into a Channel and on into a Trading Range. This progression happens 75% of the time. The other 25% of the time it will be different.

The BO and Channel portions of the cycle together comprise what can be called “the trend”.

For instance, a bull channel that does not lead to a range but instead has a successful BO out of the top of the channel and the bull trend continues. In such a case, the cycle is starting over. It starts with the BO of the previous bull channel ….then the new channel …..then a range. This sort of PA usually renders a MM (measured move) as the unexpected is happening. When unexpected events happen I look for bigger moves.

It is important to first locate where price is in the market channel. That can usually be done quickly with a visual glance. I may have to draw a few lines to better see it but that usually only takes a few seconds. When a RTH’s session opens there aren’t enough bars to determine the phase of the cycle that price is in, because no cycle has yet been made for the session. So, what I do is look at the overnight session, especially, paying attention to price action from around 1:30 a.m. to the open of the next RTH’s. Usually that is enough that will give me some sense of what phase of the cycle price is in at the open of RTH’s.

Once there are enough bars in the RTH’s session (usually 20 or more) then I will begin determining the cycle from the open of the RTH’s (regular trading hours). And will generally play the market based upon the cycle found within the RTH’s. Occasionally I might still glance at the overnight cycle and correlate that with the RTH’s cycle if things are unclear. However, the more bars we get in the RTH’s as time moves along, my tendency is to rely more on what I see in the RTH’s as opposed to what I see in the overnight.

Remember the larger context is that market cycle. It is important. Why? First to see the pressure operating in the market from a larger perspective. The market is “made” by institutions doing their buying and selling and they cannot hide the pressures they are creating in the market. They are the ones drawing the chart, so to speak. We, as retail traders, are just trying to “get into” picture that they are drawing, positioning ourselves in the drawing to extract a profit. The second reason for locating what phase the cycle is in, is that, whatever the present cycle is, well that will determine the tactics or techniques I will employ, and the setups I will use. See, BO’s (breakouts) are traded differently that channels. While ranges and channel are similar (a channel is a tilted range) and traded with similar techniques there are also difference between them that will lead to the use of different techniques.
 
Last edited:
Don’t get offended if I clarify abbreviations such as RTH’s (regular trading hours) or PB’s (pull backs). I am not talking down to anyone nor assuming most traders don’t know what these stand for. I am simply doing this for new traders or perhaps other traders that simply aren't familiar with the terms.
 
I want to show the cycle I have been talking about with it's phases. Remember there are techniques for trading each phase of the cycle.

Then I will show some trades I took this morning introducing a technique I don't think I have discussed before in this journal or if I did, it was a very casual mention. I want to look at this technique with a little more detail. I used it this morning. So I will post some trades this morning. I will post the charts enlarged and marked up and give an explanation of them later today. I am done trading for the day.

But in the meantime I will post the larger context chart showing the market cycle occurring over and over. This is a 24 hour chart so that I can go back enough to mark up the cycles. It is VERY IMPORTANT to understand this concept of cycles. These are the larger contexts that I speak of and these determine my tactics and setups I will use in trading. Each phase of the cycle has it's own techniques.

At the last range on the right you will see my trades made today. Later today I will posts a couple of more chart describing these trades and the technique I want to introduce to this journal.

First, how the cycle works:

cycle.jpg


SO.....RANGE ..THEN BO....THEN MOVES TO CHANNEL....THEN INTO RANGE AGAIN. (IN A NUTSHELL ...BO ....CHANNEL...RANGE) The process repeats about 75% of the time in this order. There will be about 25% of the time it may DO EITHER OF THE FOLLOWING BELOW.

1) From RANGE to BO to RANGE SKIPPING CHANNEL WITH ONE RANGE ON TOP OF THE OTHER. STAIR STEPPING. THESE SCENARIO PROVIDES MANY RANGE TRADING OPPORTUNITIES.

2) RANGE TO CHANNEL THAT HAS A BO OF THE CHANNEL DIRECTLY INTO ANOTHER CHANNEL SKIPPING THE RANGE AFTER THE FIRST CHANNEL. THESE ARE MANY TIMES GOOD FOR A MEASURED MOVE UP. AND FOR PRESSING A TRADE.

3) BO TO RANGE SKIPPNG THE CHANNEL BETWEEN THEM.

4) RANGE TO MULTI-LEG BO SKIPPING THE CHANNEL AND EVENTUALLY JUST MORPHING INTO A RANGE. THESE ARE GOOD FOR PRESSING A TRADE. THAT IS, ADDING TO A WINNING POSITION. IN A WAY THESE ARE JUST VERY TIGHT CHANNELS. YOU CAN CALLED THEM MULTI-LEG BO'S OR TIGHT CHANNELS. IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT YOU CALL THEM. WHAT MATTERS IS THE PA (PRICE ACTION)

P.S. I forgot to write it in the chart above but between that last bear channel and that last range area (where my trades took place) there WAS a BO between the channel and the beginning of the range. It was a successful BO south of that last channel. The charts later today should have that BO annotated.

I got other things to do but will try sometime today to post the other charts and give explanations.
 
Last edited:
The technique I want set forth is trading BO out points. These can be previous highs or lows. They can take place anywhere but when the larger context support it then the odds are more favorable. I took several of these in MES this morning and the entries and exits are in the chart above in my post #1229. I will post a more detailed chart later today of these MES trades. Since there were several trades of this sort in MES, and wishing to not complicate showing the process, I decided to make one trade in the ES, to first show the concept. I think it will make it easier to see the idea and then later I will post the chart that is annotated and has the MES trades on it.

Basically the idea is this: When there is a BO of anything...for instance, a previous high or low and then the BO fails and goes the opposite way there is a tendency for the market within a few bars to close the gap and go back to test the BO point. This is especially true in Ranges but also in channels that are not too steep.

Now the first thing to do is look at the larger context. In this case price had traded back up in the channel and was now near the top. That favors price going down. It broke above the previous swing high (see magenta line or BO point) then traded down towards the middle of the channel. It is a bear channel so it could trade on down to the bottom before it heads back up.

I am willing to average down BETTING that it will trade back up to the BO point at least enough for a decent scalp before it would trade to the bottom of the channel. I am betting it will close the gap between my first entry long and the swing high magenta BO point. Price is now, at the time of my entries, around the middle of the channel.

But I am willing to average down all the way to the bottom of the channel, if need be. Why? because most BO's of a channel (75% maybe 70% in a bear channel BO out of the bottom) will fail and price will trade back up into the channel enough to get out of my averaged down position with a profitable scalp.

As it happened I entered long then averaged down some more then price started right back up closing that gap (red box). I exited with a several point scalp. I could have held for even more but I wanted to make sure it worked well so I could explain it to you all. ROFLMAO. So I grabbed the profit. But as you can see it went on up to the BO point.

See this is a technique to use at practically any point, in a range or channel, that is not too steep. It is basically fading BO's of higher highs and lower lows. If you look to the left of the labeled BO point you will see another swing high that could have been utilized as a BO point after the BO failed and price went down some (5 bars). Then it went sideways a few bars then headed back up to the next swing high (which is the magenta swing high I drew in as a BO point for the next trade). See the gap was filled here too. This process capitalizes on the institutions that are constantly probing price for fair value. This goes on all session long. That is one reason why I say money can be made on most any bar of the 81 bars (5 min bars) in the RTH's session.

The technique doesn't work as well in steep channels or narrow ranges. But it works over and over in broad ranges (broad enough for a 1 to 8 point scalp).

In lower lows I would fade the BO point (the lower low) and sell higher expecting the gap between the lower low and my higher short entry to close. Just remember, look first at the larger context the market cycle. I want to use this technique in broad, not tight or steep channels, and in broad enough ranges to render a scalp.

Now just look at the chart. See if you can pick out any swing lows it would worked on, for me. Remember in such a case entries will be up above the swing low …averaging down and maybe adding to it, even more, should it move against me then waiting to exit a few bars later as it tests the BO point.


ES BO  2.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top